Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-06 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > There is no latex log file running lilypond nonverbose. > > After applying the patch: > > Layout output to `simple.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number > Syntax error: Bad fd number > Converting to `simple.dvi'... > Converting to `simple.ps'... > Converting to `simple.pd

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-06 Thread Bertalan Fodor
With lilypond --verbose it works! And it generates different TEX file than lilypond ly example: \score { \context Staff { c d e f } } I've attached the TEX output of both. Note that changed magfont.. to magfont for easier compare. Bert % Generated by Lil

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-06 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Ah, sorry. The log file told the problem. It was related to accented chars in the lyrics. I fixed it, it is OK now. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Bertalan Fodor writes: > Or almost, I get an error message, however the generated file is correct: > > Error invoking `latex \\nonstopmode \\input A-falusi-kislany_mel.tex > > /dev/null 2>&1 '. Return value 256 Are you using ash or bash for /bin/sh? What happens if you invoke this by hand, in as

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-06 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Or almost, I get an error message, however the generated file is correct: Error invoking `latex \\nonstopmode \\input A-falusi-kislany_mel.tex > /dev/null 2>&1 '. Return value 256 It seems to be perfect now. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PR

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-06 Thread Bertalan Fodor
It seems to be perfect now. Bert try this patch, ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-05 Thread Herman Grootaers
On Saturday 06 November 2004 00:59, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > There is no latex log file running lilypond nonverbose. > > > > After applying the patch: > > > > Layout output to `simple.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number > > Syntax error: Bad fd number > > Converting to

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-05 Thread Bertalan Fodor
There is no latex log file running lilypond nonverbose. After applying the patch: Layout output to `simple.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number Syntax error: Bad fd number Converting to `simple.dvi'... Converting to `simple.ps'... Converting to `simple.pdf'... Error invoking `latex \\nonstopmode \\in

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > There is no latex log file running lilypond nonverbose. > > After applying the patch: > > Layout output to `simple.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number > Syntax error: Bad fd number > Converting to `simple.dvi'... > Converting to `simple.ps'... > Converting to `simple.pd

Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > With lilypond --verbose it works! > > And it generates different TEX file than lilypond > > ly example: > \score { > \context Staff { > c d e f > } > } > Strange; I suspect that latex is complaining. Can you check if the .log file con

2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > When compiling a file with 2.4.0 on cygwin I get the following error and > no dvi is generated: > > Layout output to `A-falusi-kislany_mel.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number > Syntax error: Bad fd number This doesn't ring a bell. What does lilypond --verbose say? --

2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number

2004-11-05 Thread Bertalan Fodor
When compiling a file with 2.4.0 on cygwin I get the following error and no dvi is generated: Layout output to `A-falusi-kislany_mel.tex'...Syntax error: Bad fd number Syntax error: Bad fd number Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http