Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything

2010-04-18 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:00:14AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2010/4/16 Graham Percival : > > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the > > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc > > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included. > > > > Bug squ

Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything

2010-04-18 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/4/16 Graham Percival : > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included. > > Bug squad: if you're verifying an issue and it wasn't fixed, change > the fixed_2_1

Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything

2010-04-16 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/4/16 Graham Percival : > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included. I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits in lilypond/trans

2.13.18 might not contain everything

2010-04-16 Thread Graham Percival
My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc fix added a few days ago) wasn't included. Bug squad: if you're verifying an issue and it wasn't fixed, change the fixed_2_13_18 to fixed_2_13_19 and test it once