On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Noeck . IMHO the output
>
> would look better like this:
Thanks, Noeck - This has been entered as Issue #5036 128 beaming.
Ralph
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
I am forwarding this to the bug-list now. I am not sure it's a bug, but
I'm sure you can tell me and I don't it want to get lost...
Hi,
is this a bug or done on purpose? The following snippet produces beams
of which the lowest beam does not touch the staff line below.
{ g128[ g
