On 5-Apr-06, at 4:19 AM, Laura Conrad wrote:
(no point and click)
GP> Exact proposal, please. A new section in chapter 4?
Definitely the command line version should be documented when you say
"lilypond --help".
It's already included in the info for "lilypond -dhelp". I already
think
me it
installed new ghost, py, java, etc. Good luck.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Huge-.pdf-file-size-t1400825.html#a3778188
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs forum at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lil
Dennis O'Toole wrote:
See attached. Interestingly, the.ps is correspondingly smaller as
it used to be in the 2 MB range.
There is something very strange going on with this file
muurbloem:/tmp/ms$ pdfinfo TULIPS_2006-04-03.pdf
Creator:LilyPond 2.8.0
Producer: GPL Ghostscript 8.1
Dennis O\'Toole wrote:
I posted the following previously:
After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
store and distribute, so much that
> I am seeing a 5x to 10x increase in .pdf file size
> when using 2.8.1. versus 2.6. For example a simple
> 4 page score goes from 380K to 2.1MB.
>
> This is using Windows XP.
I corresponded a little with Dennis about this off-list. If the
culprit is a mis-configured Ghostscript,
I posted the following previously:
After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.
I am seeing a 5x to 10x increase in .pdf file size
when using 2.8.1. versus 2.6. For example a simple
4 page score goes from 380K to 2.1MB.
This is using Windows XP.
Thank you.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http
> "GP" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Put this at the top of your input file:
>>> #(ly:set-option (quote no-point-and-click))
>>
>> Should this be given more prominent play in the manual? I think we've
>> had several questions on it of late, and you kin
On 4-Apr-06, at 10:04 AM, Geoff Horton wrote:
Put this at the top of your input file:
#(ly:set-option (quote no-point-and-click))
Should this be given more prominent play in the manual? I think we've
had several questions on it of late, and you kind of have to know the
answer already to go lo
Dennis O'Toole wrote:
After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6
to use.
> the problem with file sizes doesn't have anything to do with point &
> click though. It's usually that people are running unpatched Ghostscript
> 8.x instead of using the GUB builds.
I don't know about that. I ran a few files through with and without that line:
With point-and-click enabled: 76
David Feuer wrote:
On 4/4/06, Geoff Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
store and distribute, so
On 4/4/06, Geoff Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
> > > considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
> > > formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
> > > store and distribute, s
> > After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
> > considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
> > formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
> > store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6
> > to use.
>
> Put
> After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
> considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
> formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
> store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6
> to use.
Put this at the
After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are
considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size
formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to
store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6
to use.
Thank you.
_
16 matches
Mail list logo
