Am 21.06.2017 um 22:28 schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier:
For choral music it is an old convention to merge dynamics if time of start,
time of end, and target are all identical.
I see. But wouldn't it be preference (style) rather than a bug?
Hmm. I think that I do not know enough of other notation t
> For choral music it is an old convention to merge dynamics if time of start,
> time of end, and target are all identical.
I see. But wouldn't it be preference (style) rather than a bug? I
suppose you want that to be the default to merge most(all?) dynamics?
I used \partcombineChords in your exam
Hi Pierre-Luc!
Concerning "Bug1", I do not think the \< \mp should be merged. The part combine
in this section is using two voices. The notes are not connected. How would you know if the
hairpin is for voiceTwo *and* voiceOne?
For choral music it is an old convention to merge dynamics if tim
Hi Knut,
Concerning "Bug1",
I do not think the \< \mp should be merged. The part combine in this
section is using two voices. The notes are not connected. How would
you know if the hairpin is for voiceTwo *and* voiceOne?
--
Pierre-Luc Gauthier
___
bug
Hi everybody!
See attached mwe.
Knut
\version "2.19.55"
\pointAndClickOff
one = { a'4\p 4 4 4 2\< 2 4\mp 4 4 4 \repeat volta 2 { 4 4 4 4 } }
two = { d'4\p 4 4 4 2\< 2 4\mp 4 4 4 \repeat volta 2 { 4 4 4 4 } }
three = { d'4\p 4 4 4 4\< 4 4 4 4\mp 4 4 4 \repeat volta 2 { 4 4 4 4 } }
f
