[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I wrote:
>
> > You have to reencode the EC fonts. If I understand your intentions
> > correctly, you want to make the input encoding basically equal to
> > the output encoding, this is, for latin1, the glyphs at font
> > positions 0x20-0x8F and 0xA0-0xFF should be t
> Things are not 100% clear to me after reading the message thread. Is
> this a real bug? Given that I have added the \encoding bug already.
Maybe it is the same bug, but the appearance is not the same:
\encoding is outside of \bookpaper, while `inputencoding' is within.
Werner
_
> > Hmm, you've apparently used EC.enc for the font conversion.
>
> Yes, why is that Hmm?
`Hmm' means `thinking loud'. :-)
> > This uses glyph name `\hyphen' for position 0x2D, while lilypond's
> > latin1.enc uses `\minus'.
>
> Yes, I think ISOLatin1 says 0x2D is MINUS, not HYPHEN, and EC is
> w
On Friday 13 August 2004 15.29, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Erik Sandberg writes:
> > Things are not 100% clear to me after reading the message thread. Is this
> > a real bug? Given that I have added the \encoding bug already.
>
> The description is off, because \bookpaper applies to the \book it is
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> Hmm, you've apparently used EC.enc for the font conversion.
Yes, why is that Hmm?
> This uses glyph name `\hyphen' for position 0x2D, while lilypond's
> latin1.enc uses `\minus'.
Yes, I think ISOLatin1 says 0x2D is MINUS, not HYPHEN, and EC is
wrong/different here?
I r
Erik Sandberg writes:
> Things are not 100% clear to me after reading the message thread. Is this a
> real bug? Given that I have added the \encoding bug already.
The description is off, because \bookpaper applies to the \book it is
enclosed in, or if used at toplevel, it overrides the default
b
Things are not 100% clear to me after reading the message thread. Is this a
real bug? Given that I have added the \encoding bug already.
On Sunday 08 August 2004 12.45, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> %
> % bookpaper.ly
> %
> % critical
> %
> % [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> %
>
> \version "2.3.11"
>
> \header { te
I wrote:
> You have to reencode the EC fonts. If I understand your intentions
> correctly, you want to make the input encoding basically equal to
> the output encoding, this is, for latin1, the glyphs at font
> positions 0x20-0x8F and 0xA0-0xFF should be the same as the input
> encoding values.
> > EC font encoding is simply not latin-1.
>
> We assumed that EC font encoding matches EC.enc, but that seems not
> to be the case, or there are glitches?
Where is the problem? If you select EC.enc, you get the glyphs
exactly in the order needed for LaTeX's T1 encoding. Note that the
glyph n
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> EC font encoding is simply not latin-1.
We assumed that EC font encoding matches EC.enc, but that seems not to
be the case, or there are glitches?
> If you manage to make lilypond use `latin1.enc' as the encoding
> vector, everything is fine.
I do not understand. latin
> > And even if I change the order, the `inputencoding' parameter is
> > still ignored (I get `BaSStuba' instead of `Baßtuba').
>
> IIRC, this SS is a bug of the EC fonts' encoding.
EC font encoding is simply not latin-1. If you manage to make
lilypond use `latin1.enc' as the encoding vector, ev
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> And even if I change the order, the `inputencoding' parameter is still
> ignored (I get `BaSStuba' instead of `Baßtuba').
IIRC, this SS is a bug of the EC fonts' encoding. There's also a
problem with dash/minus. I haven't investigated whether lilypond
should hack around
> > Parameters in the \bookpaper section seem to be ignored: The German
>
> If I set \bookpaper before the \book block it works ok.
Well, this is another bug then IMHO. The order of \bookpaper and
\book should be irrelevant or at least the same as with \score and
\paper.
And even if I change t
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Parameters in the \bookpaper section seem to be ignored: The German
If I set \bookpaper before the \book block it works ok.
Pedro
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailma
%
% bookpaper.ly
%
% critical
%
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%
\version "2.3.11"
\header { texidoc = "
Parameters in the \bookpaper section seem to be ignored: The German
`ß' (0xDF) gets a wrong glyph, neither indentation nor line length is
correctly set.
" }
\book{
\score {
c'1^"Baßtuba"
}
}
15 matches
Mail list logo
