Re: [musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-18 Thread James
On 12/01/14 17:50, pls wrote: On 12.01.2014, at 18:07, David Kastrup wrote: pls writes: Hm, it's rather a conversion error of expressive marks in general in combination with manual beaming (see file attached). musicxml2ly places breath marks, dynamics, fermatas, etc. _within_ manual beam br

Re: [musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-12 Thread pls
On 12.01.2014, at 18:07, David Kastrup wrote: > pls writes: > >> Hm, it's rather a conversion error of expressive marks in general in >> combination with manual beaming (see file attached). >> musicxml2ly places breath marks, dynamics, fermatas, etc. _within_ >> manual beam brackets instead of

Re: [musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-12 Thread David Kastrup
pls writes: > Hm, it's rather a conversion error of expressive marks in general in > combination with manual beaming (see file attached). > musicxml2ly places breath marks, dynamics, fermatas, etc. _within_ > manual beam brackets instead of _after_ the right square bracket. Most of that is total

Re: [musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-12 Thread pls
On 12.01.2014, at 13:29, James wrote: > On 12/01/14 07:57, pls wrote: >> On 12.01.2014, at 03:52, Andre Soares wrote: >> >>I'm not top posting. >>> >Hello! >>> >I have this example file.xml: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >

Re: [musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-12 Thread James
On 12/01/14 07:57, pls wrote: On 12.01.2014, at 03:52, Andre Soares wrote: >>I'm not top posting. >Hello! >I have this example file.xml: > > > > > > > > >C >4 > >2 >

Re: [musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-11 Thread pls
On 12.01.2014, at 03:52, Andre Soares wrote: >> I'm not top posting. > Hello! > I have this example file.xml: > > > > > > > > >C >4 > >2 >begin >

[musicxml2ly] breath mark inside beam

2014-01-11 Thread Andre Soares
> I'm not top posting. Hello! I have this example file.xml: C 4 2 begin E