Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-03-02 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
2014-03-01 16:48 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes : > > I don't always have time to keep up with what you're doing. However, if > there is a list of snippets that should definitely be deleted from the > online version of the LSR, please let me have it and I'll delete them as > soon as I have some time. >

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-03-02 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
2014-02-27 16:00 GMT+01:00 James : > Hello, Hi James, > > When do we need to remove these from Snippets/new in git? > I suppose Seba will tell us. I can send the tarball tonight if needed ~Pierre ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org h

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-03-01 Thread Phil Holmes
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message news:caphotuucr2+z43wxa_bvm7knflg57hzl04iggnoccuzubya...@mail.gmail.com... Dear All, I'm glad to inform you that all snippets have been checked updated/upgraded since yestreday night. 2 exceptions : - "Free Meter - increasing the barnumber" (no soluti

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-27 Thread James
Hello, On 26/02/14 18:00, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Dear All, I'm glad to inform you that all snippets have been checked updated/upgraded since yestreday night. 2 exceptions : - "Free Meter - increasing the barnumber" (no solution found yet). - "Hymn Template for per-voice music and \partco

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-26 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Dear All, I'm glad to inform you that all snippets have been checked updated/upgraded since yestreday night. 2 exceptions : - "Free Meter - increasing the barnumber" (no solution found yet). - "Hymn Template for per-voice music and \partcombine" (waiting for a reply from Carl Sorensen regarding hi

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-23 Thread Paul Morris
Thomas Morley-2 wrote >> I just have a question about snippets that have _not_ been approved yet, >> either because they required an LSR upgrade or for some other reason. >> Will >> these survive the upgrade process without being lost? > > Yes. > They will be added through the web-interface after

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-23 Thread Thomas Morley
2014-02-23 21:09 GMT+01:00 Paul Morris : > Hello Pierre, > > Many many thanks for all your work upgrading the LSR! I know it must be a > huge effort of time and energy. The upgrade was definitely needed. +1 > I just have a question about snippets that have _not_ been approved yet, > either becau

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-23 Thread Paul Morris
Hello Pierre, Many many thanks for all your work upgrading the LSR! I know it must be a huge effort of time and energy. The upgrade was definitely needed. I just have a question about snippets that have _not_ been approved yet, either because they required an LSR upgrade or for some other reason

Re: [LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-23 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
One last thing... There's a bunch of snippets that are slightly modified (minor changes such as updates to v2.18 functions...) and that I did not make any list... Hope you'll not care ! ~Pierre ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://li

[LSR v2.18] Work in progress (in short)

2014-02-23 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Dear Bug Squad, Dear Editors, Dear Contributers, As, *langsam, aber nicht zu sehr*, I can see the finish line, I think it's time to take a small break to see how things are going on up to now. First of all, I'd like to warmly thank all of you for your fine answers/solutions and support and also fo