. 10)
> However, it didn't seem to have any effect, see
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2004-02/msg00047.html
>
> /Mats
>
> Kevin C. Baird wrote:
> >Hi. Thank you. #'no-spacing-rods helped. I did want to expand a bit with
> >the X-exte
X-extent = #(
-10 . 10)
\version "2.1.0"
\include "english.ly"
\header {
title = "No Clergy"
subtitle = "(tupletpc=50, restpc=25, artpc=25, dynpc=25)"
instrument = "Clarinet"
composer = "Kevin
esting
> the direction yourself.
>
> /Mats
>
> Kevin C. Baird wrote:
> >Attached. Thank you.
> >
> >On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:12:33AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Kevin C. Baird wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:12:33AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> Kevin C. Baird wrote:
> >Hello.
> >
[snip]
> >I also find that my dynamic markings collide horizontally. Is there an
> >easy way to mandate more horizontal space when a note has a dynamic
&
Attached. Thank you.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:12:33AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
>
> Kevin C. Baird wrote:
> >Hello.
> >
> >With Lilypond 2.1.0-2 on Debian Testing, I get all of my stems up
> >without declaring a direction. What would be the easiest wa
Hello.
With Lilypond 2.1.0-2 on Debian Testing, I get all of my stems up
without declaring a direction. What would be the easiest way to get a
more standard stem direction scheme (i.e., in toward the majority of the
staff unless beamed)?
I also find that my dynamic markings collide horizontal
Hi. In the attached file, The Lilypond output of measure 16 (a 9/8 bar)
only allows 8.5 8ths in the measure, causing the final legal 16th note
to spill over into measure 17.
I've attached the .ly file and the output of
'apt-cache show lilypond' on my Debian testing i386 system.
Please let me k
