On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Barry wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to test it. I'm using the package in
> Fedora's repo, so I suppose I should take it up with them? I'm not
> sure how to troubleshoot further. Reinstalling didn't help.
>
> Kevin
>
> __
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jon Ciesla writes:
>
> > Lilypond 2.19.36/7 fails to build with GCC6 using the c++14 std, which is
> > the new default for GCC6, as present in Fedora 24+. Attached is a patch
> > allowing Lilpond 2.19.37 to build.
Lilypond 2.19.36/7 fails to build with GCC6 using the c++14 std, which is
the new default for GCC6, as present in Fedora 24+. Attached is a patch
allowing Lilpond 2.19.37 to build. Please review and adopt if applicable.
If there are better corrections than what I've done here, please let me
know
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Martin Tarenskeen
wrote:
> so why is it not failing with Fedora 21? Fedora 21 and 22 use the same
> Pango version?
>
> MT
>
> On 29 mei 2015 2:05:16 PM Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Masamic
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Masamichi HOSODA
wrote:
> > The Fedora 22 package fails for everyone, the www.lilypond.org version
> > works.
> >
> > I tried this minimal example:
> >
> > % f22test.ly
> > \version "2.19.21"
> > {c'}
> >
> > And then did
> >
> > $ lilypond --ps --verbose f22.ly &
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> Maybe Lilypond should package the old URW fonts until a
> >> good replacement is available to avoid such dependencies.
> >
> > Possibly. Until such time as that occurs, is there a way I can
> > disable Cyrillic support temporarily so th
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> > >> With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the
> >> > >> Cyrillic glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x
> >> > >> and 2.19.x still need ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond fails to
> >> > >> build in rawhi
>> lilypond-u...@gnu.org
>>
>>
>> Knute Snortum
>> (via Gmail)
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Jon Ciesla
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>&g
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the Cyrillic
>> glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x and 2.19.x still need
>&
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> With the latest release of the UFW fonts, they've dropped the Cyrillic
> glyphs due to poor quality. I see that both 2.18.x and 2.19.x still need
> ufw's ru fonts, and so lilypond fails to build in rawhide. Is there
ecommend or
are planning to migrate to?
The Fedora BZ for reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160132
Thanks,
Jon Ciesla, Fedora lilypond maintainer.
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in
11 matches
Mail list logo
