x27;t
want to have compromises in quality anywhere.
Cheers, Arno
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail
gesendet.
Am 17.07.22, 16:04 schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
Le 15/07/2022 à 19:10, Arno Waschk a écrit :
> Hi Jean,
>
> t
wrote:
Le 13/07/2022 à 12:58, Arno Waschk a écrit :
Hi all,
I know the topic itself is not new, and I am aware that lilypond can't
easily take advantage from multiple CPU cores as the way it "compiles"
lilypond notation into a final pdf file does not allow for it.
But there could b
Hi all,
I know the topic itself is not new, and I am aware that lilypond can't
easily take advantage from multiple CPU cores as the way it "compiles"
lilypond notation into a final pdf file does not allow for it.
But there could be an exception to be used for it: Slicing a (big, of
course, we won
Hi all,
I know the topic itself is not new, and I am aware that lilypond can't
easily take advantage from multiple CPU cores as the way it "compiles"
lilypond notation into a final pdf file does not allow for it.
But there could be an exception to be used for it: Slicing a (big, of
course, we won
[pixel.php?site=bug-lilypond@gnu.orgmmxmm]
Weitergeleitete Mail:
Liebe Freunde,
im Januar 2013 soll im Deutschen Bundestag ein umfassendes
Rentenreformpaket beschlossen werden, das eine
Rentenversicherungs-pflicht fA 1/4r SelbstACURndige beinhaltet. Die
daraus resultierenden
Am 30.10.2011 13:06, schrieb Phil Holmes:
"Arno Waschk" wrote in message
news:4ead28ea.6090...@gmx.de...
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: CRASH
I am using latest git checkout of lilypond. The .ly File(s) i am using
ist pretty complex, but i am currently t
Original-Nachricht
Betreff:Re: CRASH
Datum: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:23:00 +0100
Von:Arno Waschk
Antwort an: a...@arnowaschk.de
An: David Kastrup
Arno writes:
I am not top posting
Lilypond crashes while "compiling" one of my scores very un
dear list,
the following
\version "2.15.4"
\parallelMusic #'(abc def) {
2 q|
2 q|
% 2 2 |
% 2 2 |
}
\new Staff {<<
\relative c'' \abc
\relative c' \def
>>}
does not produce the desired result, since the second "chord" is one
octave lower then the first.
it does work whe
result as in resource consumption...
yours, arno
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:59:55 +0200, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
well, i came across this problem while creating a *real-world* score,
having
1600+ bars and using GBs of memory. it also
6 \times 10/9{c16 c16. c16 c16}
\overrideBeamSettings #'Staff #'(10 . 32) #'end
#'((* . (1))
)
\time 10/32 \times 10/9{c16 c16. c16 c16}
}
Why, and how can i change that?
Yours, Arno
--
Arno Waschk
+49-172-3149605
http://www.arnowaschk.de
upcoming projects:
E
(the problem is that they aren't cached sensibly and
they aren't actually correct to begin with).
Since it more than doubles the computation time (often by far) there must
be something redundant, no?
Cheers, Arno
Cheers,
Joe
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 13:49 +0200, Arno Wasch
feeling it introduces calculations of information
which already seems to be known to lily, when looking at the
annotate-spacing output of earlier versions...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:29:39 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
will try to find out, but in the moment i am searching an old version
whi
commit it was? Also, can you send an example
which demonstrates the problem? If it is a long score with many
\pageBreaks, then it might be due to fcc66561444b7.
Cheers,
Joe
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 23:56 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
it appears compared to a "2.13.25" which i compiled some day
oops, with lilypond from git i am getting "compiling" times higher by a
factor >10, and huge distances between staves! Bug of feature?
yours, arno
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:50:24 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:05 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:41:47 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 16:19 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
dear list,
the following:
\version "2.13.23"
\include "deutsch.ly"
TempoMark={ \time 4/4 \repeat unfold 20 {s1*5 \mark \default} }
celloPart = \new Staff \w
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:59:05 +0200, James Lowe
wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of
Arno Waschk
Sent: Tue 22/06/2010 19:17
To: Lilypond Bugreports; lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Subject: q notation for repeated chords
t; thing in the notation doc page
is not exactly obvious to me...
yours, arno
--
Arno Waschk
+49-172-3149605
http://www.arnowaschk.de
upcoming projects:
Eggert: Bordellballade (WP) Dessau, Koblenz, Berlin
Schlingensief: Two new Projects (Burkina Faso, Brussels, Hamburg, Munich,
Mühlhe
ther comments out the "\mark ..." line, or uses
lilypond 2.12.
this seems like a regression bug, no?
could not yet find something similar on the issue tracker.
yours, Arno
--
Arno Waschk
+49-172-3149605
http://www.arnowaschk.de
upcoming projects:
Eggert: Bordellballade (WP) Dessau,
Trevor, thanks for the help.
But should not lilypond define a default minimum-length that makes it at
least visible. Or if it does (what i would assume), why does it not work?
Thanks again, Arno
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:16 +0100, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
Arno Waschk wrote Sunday, March
what
was thankfully proposed below?
Thanks, Arno
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:45:56 +0100, Francisco Vila
wrote:
2010/3/21 Arno Waschk :
Dear list,
the following ...
\version "2.13.13"
\relative c''{\times 4/5{r16 c4~}\times 4/5{c4 r16}}
gives here (ubuntu)
a tuplet wi
Dear list,
the following ...
\version "2.13.13"
\relative c''{\times 4/5{r16 c4~}\times 4/5{c4 r16}}
gives here (ubuntu)
a tuplet without bracket in the first half, but a tuplet with bracket in
the second half.
Is that a bug or a feature?
Yours, Arno
___
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Salut.
Pouvez vous nous expliquer cette manipulation demandé?
Messages? Erreurs?
Arno
Am 27.02.2007, 19:21 Uhr, schrieb Marc Bonnarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Je voudrai essayer votre logiciel.
Je l'ai installé, mais au démarage celui ci me demande de faire une
manipulation que je ne comprend pas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Zum Letzten Mal!!! Zum Letzen Mal!!!
Zum le-he-tzten Mal!!!
Sonntag 18. Februar 19.30 Uhr
Berlin Volksb�¼hne
Kunst und Gem�¼se Schlingensief/Sch�¶nberg (Von Heute auf Morgen)
mit Bebbi Bindert, Maximilian von Mayenburg, Arno Waschk, Matthias Badczong
Dear list,
may I propose the following patch, without it i cannot compile lilypond:
diff --git a/lily/lily-parser-scheme.cc b/lily/lily-parser-scheme.cc
index 8bc7ca0..305359c 100644
--- a/lily/lily-parser-scheme.cc
+++ b/lily/lily-parser-scheme.cc
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include
#include "lily-par
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stendal Theater 25. November 19.30 Uhr
Evita Rice/Webber
!!!
Leider entf�¤llt:
Berlin Volksb�¼hne 26. November 19.30 Uhr
Kunst und Gem�¼se Schlingensief/Sch�¶nberg (Von Heute auf Morgen)
Vorschau:
Cage Europera5 in Madrid (Zeitgen�¶ssische Oper Berlin)
I can offer some hacking time for midi output if i am pointed towards some
problematic lily files like the mentioned below during the next weeks.
Arno
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:37:59 +0200, Mats Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This problem has been reported a number of times but unfortu
I agree. For me the real *bug* is that #'dash-fraction = #0.97 makes all
noteheads, clefs and markups disappear in the following score output. And
it took me a while to find the culprit
Arno
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:08:38 +0100, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From: &
dear list,
the following example i have been using in 2.7.38 downloadable windows
version (as well as my hand-made cygwin 2.7.38 version) gives a continous
line which is not what one would expect for 0.96 fraction. (It starts to
be continous from around 0.9)
No huge problem, BUT:
giving 0.
--- Forwarded message ---
From: "Arno Waschk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug in textspanner??
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:16:15 +0100
dear list,
the following example i have been using in 2.7.38 downloadable w
30 matches
Mail list logo
