Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread Knut Petersen
This problems seems to be related to https://codereview.appspot.com/314130043/ The file http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf seems to be  the intermediate version of notation.pdf. pdfinfo shows: Creator: XeTeX output 2018.06.24:1343 Producer:   xdvipdfmx (0

Re: End-of-line-Slur shortend by clef in other staff

2018-06-25 Thread Simon Albrecht
This should be the same as . Best, Simon On 25.06.2018 09:22, Wendl, Arnold wrote: very ugly Hello, The end of line occurrence of a broken slur is shortened, if another staff contains a clef change at that line break. Example shows thi

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread Knut Petersen
Hi everybody! Back at home. Never had a look at GUB previously. git clone http://github.com/gperciva/gub cd gub make bootstrap fails after 2+ minutes with: building package: tools::make  *** Stage: download (make, tools)  *** Stage: untar (make, tools)  *** Stage: patch

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > On 2018-06-25 04:04, David Kastrup wrote: >> "James Lowe" writes: >>> If Aaron has specific examples (which doc, which page) then maybe I >>> can at least confirm this on master if that is going to help or not? >> >> But yes: specific examples would be good. > > No problem.

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-06-25 04:04, David Kastrup wrote: "James Lowe" writes: If Aaron has specific examples (which doc, which page) then maybe I can at least confirm this on master if that is going to help or not? But yes: specific examples would be good. No problem. Notation Reference, Chapter 1: Music

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread David Kastrup
"James Lowe" writes: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:50:51 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Aaron Hill writes: >> >> > With the release of 2.19.82, I pulled down the latest docs in PDF form >> > for reference. However, it appears nearly all of them have notation >> > with missing or incorrect fonts.

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread James Lowe
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:50:51 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Aaron Hill writes: > > > With the release of 2.19.82, I pulled down the latest docs in PDF form > > for reference. However, it appears nearly all of them have notation > > with missing or incorrect fonts. The HTML versions seem fin

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > With the release of 2.19.82, I pulled down the latest docs in PDF form > for reference. However, it appears nearly all of them have notation > with missing or incorrect fonts. The HTML versions seem fine and show > the notation snippets correctly. Ugh. That's what we have

PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

2018-06-25 Thread Aaron Hill
With the release of 2.19.82, I pulled down the latest docs in PDF form for reference. However, it appears nearly all of them have notation with missing or incorrect fonts. The HTML versions seem fine and show the notation snippets correctly. -- Aaron Hill ___

End-of-line-Slur shortend by clef in other staff

2018-06-25 Thread Wendl, Arnold
> very ugly Hello, The end of line occurrence of a broken slur is shortened, if another staff contains a clef change at that line break. Example shows this in version 2.18.2, version 2.19.81, and also 2.15.41 (and newer). It did work correctly in version 2.15.39 (and more early versions). \sco