Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Knoop writes: > At 10:32 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >>Am 17.05.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Mark Knoop: >>> At 05:47 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: Mark, can you give us a reason why you consider relative point-and-click links "broken"? >>> I am unaware of any way for the pdf

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
At 10:32 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >Am 17.05.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Mark Knoop: >> At 05:47 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >>> Mark, can you give us a reason why you consider relative >>> point-and-click links "broken"? >> I am unaware of any way for the pdf viewer, or the whatever hand

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread Urs Liska
Am 17.05.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Mark Knoop: > At 05:47 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >> Mark, can you give us a reason why you consider relative >> point-and-click links "broken"? > I am unaware of any way for the pdf viewer, or the whatever handles the > textedit url, to know what the link is

Re: regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-17 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Knoop writes: >>> The point-and-click link in the resulting pdf is relative: >>> textedit://testpaths.ly:9:2:3 - and therefore doesn't work. >> >>Hm, the PDF you attached *does* give an absolute link, but: > > Yes, sorry, testing with different versions and attached the wrong one. > See atta

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
At 05:47 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >Mark, can you give us a reason why you consider relative >point-and-click links "broken"? I am unaware of any way for the pdf viewer, or the whatever handles the textedit url, to know what the link is relative to. Correct me if I am wrong on this. -- Ma

Re: regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
>> The point-and-click link in the resulting pdf is relative: >> textedit://testpaths.ly:9:2:3 - and therefore doesn't work. > >Hm, the PDF you attached *does* give an absolute link, but: Yes, sorry, testing with different versions and attached the wrong one. See attached pdf now. >Indeed, this i

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > As reported by Mark Knoop in > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2016-05/msg5.html > this commit > > commit f30a8189adbbeefa2103e2c2e194040f66bc2291 > Author: Urs Liska > Date: Tue Jan 19 10:52:33 2016 +0100 > > #4747: Remove (all) uses of is-absolute?

Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread Urs Liska
As reported by Mark Knoop in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2016-05/msg5.html this commit commit f30a8189adbbeefa2103e2c2e194040f66bc2291 Author: Urs Liska Date: Tue Jan 19 10:52:33 2016 +0100 #4747: Remove (all) uses of is-absolute? The check for absolute paths

Re: regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-17 Thread Urs Liska
Am 17.05.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Mark Knoop: > Thanks Urs, > > At 09:37 on 13 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >> Which version of LilyPond and what Linux exactly do you use (2.19.40 >> binary release?)? > lilypond 2.19.40, on Fedora 23, distro build (lilypond-2.19.40-1.fc23) > > However I have just down

Re: regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
Thanks Urs, At 09:37 on 13 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >Which version of LilyPond and what Linux exactly do you use (2.19.40 >binary release?)? lilypond 2.19.40, on Fedora 23, distro build (lilypond-2.19.40-1.fc23) However I have just downloaded 2.19.41 binary release from lilypond.org and see th