Re: \omit dynamic occupies space

2016-04-26 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-04-25 22:07 GMT+02:00 Graham King : > The Notation Reference says [1]: " omit [music] - item (symbol list or > music): Set item's "stencil" property to #f, effectively omitting it > without taking up space. " > > However, when applied to dynamics, space is taken up. This is > inconvenient, as

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-04-26 12:04 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2016-04-26 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Thomas Morley writes: >>> 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes : > Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? > Moving > the note i

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-04-26 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes : Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on th

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread Phil Holmes
"David Kastrup" wrote in message news:87mvog3f7z@fencepost.gnu.org... Thomas Morley writes: 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes : Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the typesetter's

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-04-26 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes : >>> Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving >>> the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the >>> typesetter's preference. >> >>

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes : >> Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving >> the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the >> typesetter's preference. > > It's clearly a bug. See this small (not tiny) exampl

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
Graham King writes: > First, an apology to the developers, and in particular to Harm, for my > previous, hasty, attempt to report this in March, which must have > appeared selfishly peremptory. Fortunately the message seems not to > have reached this list and, now that there's a gap in the rest

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread Thomas Morley
2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes : > Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving > the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the > typesetter's preference. It's clearly a bug. See this small (not tiny) example plus comments from my earlier

Re: long dynamic strings displace low notes

2016-04-26 Thread Phil Holmes
Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the typesetter's preference. -- Phil Holmes ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.g