tisimst writes:
> On 8/26/2015 4:45 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>> tisimst <[hidden email]
>> > writes:
>> > - CompositeStaff
>> > - HybridStaff
>> > - StaffBlend
>> > - AssortedStaff
>> >
>> > Maybe "StaffAxis" is the best one.
>>
>> Of those? Probably. Not that it's all that good
Greetings -
I will be out of town, and pretty much out of internet capability, for the
next three Fridays. In other words, I shall not be able to cover August 28,
September 4, or September 11. I apologize for any inconvenience this may
cause.
In gratitude for such a wonderful program and communit
2015-08-27 0:45 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> tisimst writes:
>
>> Got it. How about one of these:
>>
>> - AlignmentStaff
>> - StaffAligner
>> - ContextAligner
>
> Bad because StaffAxis does _not_ constitute a vertical alignment (quite
> a few other Staff containers do).
>
>> - CompositeStaff
>> - H
On 8/26/2015 4:45 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> tisimst <[hidden email]
> > writes:
> > - CompositeStaff
> > - HybridStaff
> > - StaffBlend
> > - AssortedStaff
> >
> > Maybe "StaffAxis" is the best one.
>
> Of those? Probably. Not that it's all that good. I like OneStaff
> better.
tisimst writes:
> Got it. How about one of these:
>
> - AlignmentStaff
> - StaffAligner
> - ContextAligner
Bad because StaffAxis does _not_ constitute a vertical alignment (quite
a few other Staff containers do).
> - CompositeStaff
> - HybridStaff
> - StaffBlend
> - AssortedStaff
>
> Maybe "Sta
On 8/26/2015 4:23 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> tisimst <[hidden email]
> > writes:
>
> > On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> >> David Kastrup <[hidden email]
> >>
> >> > Perhaps OneStaff?
> >
> >> \oneVoice _is_ sort of the name for not separating voices vert
tisimst writes:
> On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>> David Kastrup <[hidden email]
>>
>> > Perhaps OneStaff?
>
>> \oneVoice _is_ sort of the name for not separating voices vertically.
>
> I can see that, but it still doesn't seem quite right to me. As I've
> thought ab
On 8/26/2015 1:14 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> David Kastrup <[hidden email]
> > writes:
>
> > David Kastrup <[hidden email]
> > writes:
> >
> >> tisimst <[hidden email]
> > writes:
> >>
> >>> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
> >>> if something
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> tisimst writes:
>>
>>> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
>>> if something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out
>>> loud. I love this idea, btw.
>>
>> "StaffAxis" is as appropriate as it g
This is a nice addition! I'm not opposed to "StaffAxis" either, but here's
another suggestion to consider: "StaffRow".
-Paul
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
David Kastrup writes:
> tisimst writes:
>
>> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
>> if something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out
>> loud. I love this idea, btw.
>
> "StaffAxis" is as appropriate as it gets. "MixedStaff", however, might
tisimst writes:
> I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder
> if something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out
> loud. I love this idea, btw.
"StaffAxis" is as appropriate as it gets. "MixedStaff", however, might
be more suggestive of the typica
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Am 26.08.2015 um 18:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> New issue 4577
>>
>> Status: Started
>> Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
>> Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
>>
>> Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
>> Issue description:
>>Add Staf
Am 26.08.2015 um 18:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
New issue 4577
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add StaffAxis context type See the regression test for mo
I'm not necessarily against it being called "StaffAxis", but I wonder if
something like "MixedStaff" is more appropriate? Just thinking out loud.
I love this idea, btw.
- Abraham
On 8/26/2015 10:52 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>
> New issue
>
> Status: Started
> Summary: Add StaffAxi
New issue
Status: Started
Summary: Add StaffAxis context type
Tags: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
Rietveld issue: 265730043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/265730043)
Issue description:
Add StaffAxis context type See the regression test for more info.
--
David Kastrup
___
On Aug 25, 2015; 5:05pm James Lowe wrote:
> On 25/08/15 18:48, markdblackwell wrote:
>> Per
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitignore.html
>> "A gitignore file specifies intentionally untracked files that Git
>> should ignore. Files already tracked by Git are not affected"
>>
ID: 4576
STATUS: New
SUMMARY: Immediately subsequent DynamicTextSpanners collide at line break
TYPE: Ugly
LABELS:
OWNER:
%%% start message body %%
Hello,
if two DynamicTextSpanners immediately follow one another and the second
one starts at a line br
18 matches
Mail list logo
