2015-08-21 21:37 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> tisimst writes:
>
>> On 8/21/2015 5:40 AM, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I am sorry this is not the technical answer you require, but part of
>>> your answer is that lilypond can't irregularise (I am going to make
>>> this a new word)
Am 20.08.2015 um 07:29 schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht writes:
Hello,
I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen
with -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear
in any rea
Nik Repka writes:
> In any case, the file in the 2.18 is the same. Somehow that syntax
> produces the desired results... and mine does not...but as far as I
> can tell, they are the same except for the music expressions.
Your first expression starts with c'. If you take the given example and
l
In any case, the file in the 2.18 is the same. Somehow that syntax
produces the desired results... and mine does not...but as far as I can
tell, they are the same except for the music expressions.
On 8/19/2015 7:26 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Am 18.08.2015 um 23:36 schrieb Nik Repka:
Ehh it was
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Michael Gerdau wrote:
> Dear bug squad,
>
> in Documentation/web/download.texi, line 486 it reads LilyPond will
> be installed under "C:\Program Files" on Windows. Since most current
> Windows Versions are 64bit this probably should read
> "C:\Program Files (x86)"
> Any chance to see an uncensored version of this on the actual mailing list?
> --David Kastrup
Thanks for that. :) Now, I've added the archive to my toolbar for future
checking.
The full text follows (without HTML tags; I had used {raw}).
Currently, the top level .gitignore (of LilyPond's rep
> Any chance to see an uncensored version of this on the
> actual mailing list? Not everybody uses Nabble, and you
> can see what got actually sent out on the list by looking at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-08/msg00065.html
> --David Kastrup
Thanks for that. :) Now, I've
markdblackwell writes:
> Currently, the top level .gitignore (of LilyPond's repository) contains this
> pattern:
>
> I found no pattern negating this, in any .gitignore file (at any directory
> level).
>
> Currently, the repository on the server contains files (see below) which
> match this patte
