Re: ly:expect-warning message translation

2015-04-13 Thread ArnoldTheresius
ArnoldTheresius wrote >>Documentation - Internals - Scheme functions - ly:expect-warning > > I did read this paragraph in a way that the folloing should work: > #(ly:expect-warning (_ "no such internal option: %s") "dual-pdf") > But I only got an error message (on Win7/64 with version 2.18.2 and >

Vertical spacing of Lyrics messed up by system-system-spacing.basic-distance

2015-04-13 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Hi, I'm trying to add some space between systems with system-system-spacing.basic-distance inside the \paper block. In some cases the basic-distance gives more uniform spacing than the padding. However, it seems to mess up the vertical spacing of lyrics placed above a staff. There seems to be too

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Urs Liska
Am 13.04.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Masamichi HOSODA: gs: Interpreter revision (905) does not match gs_init.ps revision (915). lilypond-2.19.18-1.linux-x86.sh includes gs-9.15. However, lilypond seems to be invoking the external gs-9.05 instead of included gs-9.15. My ubuntu 64 bit environment hav

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> gs: Interpreter revision (905) does not match gs_init.ps revision > (915). lilypond-2.19.18-1.linux-x86.sh includes gs-9.15. However, lilypond seems to be invoking the external gs-9.05 instead of included gs-9.15. My ubuntu 64 bit environment have been installed gs-9.10. However, lilypond invok

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> I have just installed lilypond-2.19.18-1.linux-x86.sh on another > machine running Debian 7 stable with latest updates. And the error is > identical. Maybe (this is a big maybe) I'll have a chance to test it > on another (different) 32bit Linux installation later today, but > that's not sure at a

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Urs Liska
Am 13.04.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Masamichi HOSODA: I have just installed lilypond-2.19.18-1.linux-x86.sh on another machine running Debian 7 stable with latest updates. And the error is identical. Maybe (this is a big maybe) I'll have a chance to test it on another (different) 32bit Linux installat

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Urs Liska
Am 13.04.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Masamichi HOSODA: This is on Debian with the linux-386 binary and applies to _any_ file, even { c } . Compiling with the 2.19.17 binary works. Compiling with the 2.19.18 binary fails. Compiling with a custom build from current master works. As there are no relevan

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> This is on Debian with the linux-386 binary and applies to _any_ file, > even > { c } > . > > Compiling with the 2.19.17 binary works. > Compiling with the 2.19.18 binary fails. > Compiling with a custom build from current master works. > > As there are no relevant commits between the 2.19.18 t

Re: Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Federico Bruni
2015-04-13 10:21 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska : > Hi, > > just trying out the binary releases again, and I notice that with 2.19.18 > all documents fail with the following message: > > Layout output to `document.ps'... > > Converting to `./document.pdf'... > > warning: `(gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=5

Ghostscript problem in 2.19.18

2015-04-13 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, just trying out the binary releases again, and I notice that with 2.19.18 all documents fail with the following message: Layout output to `document.ps'... Converting to `./document.pdf'... warning: `(gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89 -dCompatibilityLev