Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> I'm now getting an error shown in > target/linux-x86/log/cross/gcc-core.log: > > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: creating testsuite/Makefile > config.status: creating config.h > config.status: executing default commands > Command barfed: cd > /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-x

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Masamichi HOSODA" To: Cc: ; ; ; Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:35 PM Subject: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version I'm now getting an error shown in target/linux-x86/log/cross/gcc-core.log: config

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
David Kastrup writes: > Ah, this was a pure host compiler problem. Maybe because GCC is written > in C++ these days. Add a system:g++ dependency somewhere, instead of system:gcc IIRC Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com |

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "Masamichi HOSODA" > To: > Cc: ; ; ; > > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:35 PM > Subject: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and > time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version > > >> Does your Ubuntu have g++? >> If not, ple

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Masamichi HOSODA" To: Cc: ; ; ; Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:35 PM Subject: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version Does your Ubuntu have g++? If not, please try the following command. $ sudo apt

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> I've just had a look at your branch on: > https://github.com/trueroad/gub/network > > That's an impressive set of patches over six months of hard work. > > Congratulations! And many thanks for moving this on! Thank you for your congratulation. ___

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> I've cloned this git repo and swapped to the gcc-4.9.2 branch and run > make bootstrap. This is on Ubuntu 14.04 32 bit running in a virtual > machine. I get an error as follows: > > Output from make: > > building package: tools::p7zip > *** Stage: download (p7zip, tools) > *** Stage: untar (p

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Masamichi HOSODA" To: Cc: ; ; ; Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:59 AM Subject: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version Therefore, in this branch, https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/gcc-4.9 I've su

Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

2015-02-22 Thread Trevor Daniels
Masamichi HOSODA wrote Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:59 AM > I've fixed the issues I found. > > Therefore, in this branch, > https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/gcc-4.9 > I've succeed GUB's ``make lilypond''. > All lilypond installers have been built by gcc-4.9.2. > > In darwin-x86 (Intel Mac), m