David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 11:53 PM
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
>> David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 10:53 PM
>>
>>>To work, \offset needs access to a default value--a number,
>>> number-pair, or list of number-pairs--or a defaul
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:53 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> Actually, it might not be hard to enhance \offset to deal with Script.
> The defaults aren't stored in define-grobs, rather they're in script.scm.
> I'll look into that.
>
The defaults are available, yes, but then we run into the same
p
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
>
> David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 10:53 PM
>
> >To work, \offset needs access to a default value--a number,
> > number-pair, or list of number-pairs--or a default procedure to calculate
> > these values with. If you don't f
David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 10:53 PM
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
>> It also fails to work on Script.padding, although it's fine for
>> DynamicLineSpanner.padding.
>>
>>Is this a similar problem?
>
> Actually, no. To work, \offset needs access
David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 10:40 PM
> Oh! You're tackling the documentation? I'm so glad to hear that :) :)
>
> I might have an example or two from when I was trying (unsuccessfully of
> course) to write something up. I think I may have been fooling with
> Beam.position
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
>
> > David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:46 PM
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Trevor Daniels
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Should \offset work with the font-size of fingering? It doesn't seem
> to.
> >>> The default value i
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
>
> David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:46 PM
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Trevor Daniels
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Should \offset work with the font-size of fingering? It doesn't seem
> to.
> >> The default value is -5, s
> David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:46 PM
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>>
>>> Should \offset work with the font-size of fingering? It doesn't seem to.
>>> The default value is -5, so offsetting by -2 should give -7, with a size as
>>> shown by
David Nalesnik wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:46 PM
>
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>
>> Should \offset work with the font-size of fingering? It doesn't seem to.
>> The default value is -5, so offsetting by -2 should give -7, with a size as
>> shown by the \ove
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
> Should \offset work with the font-size of fingering? It doesn't seem to.
> The default value is -5, so offsetting by -2 should give -7, with a size as
> shown by the \override and \tweak, but both forms of \offset give 0.
>
> {
> \set fin
Urs Liska wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 9:06 PM
> Am 1. November 2014 21:55:01 MEZ, schrieb Trevor Daniels
> :
>>
>>Thomas Morley wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:05 PM
>>
>>> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back:
>>> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used.
>>
>>Copying t
Should \offset work with the font-size of fingering? It doesn't seem to. The
default value is -5, so offsetting by -2 should give -7, with a size as shown
by the \override and \tweak, but both forms of \offset give 0.
{
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
4
\override Fingering.font-siz
2014-11-01 22:06 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 1. November 2014 21:55:01 MEZ, schrieb Trevor Daniels
> :
>>
>>Thomas Morley wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:05 PM
>>
>>> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back:
>>> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used.
>>
>>Copying to bug list.
>> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back:
>> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used.
>
> Copying to bug list. This seems like a bug to me. Do others agree? I can't
> see a relevant issue in the tracker.
Hi Trevor,
I would expect this behaviour. d1*3/4\rest does not say: put th
Am 1. November 2014 21:55:01 MEZ, schrieb Trevor Daniels
:
>
>Thomas Morley wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:05 PM
>
>> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back:
>> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used.
>
>Copying to bug list. This seems like a bug to me. Do others agree? I
Thomas Morley wrote Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:05 PM
> Using d1*3/4\rest has a draw-back:
> The rest will change it's position, if \transpose is used.
Copying to bug list. This seems like a bug to me. Do others agree? I can't
see a relevant issue in the tracker.
Trevor
_
Il giorno sab 1 nov 2014 alle 11:03, Francisco Vila
ha scritto:
I agree, please go ahead if nobody oppoes.
I prefer leaving this to someone else, also because in the coming weeks
I want to finalize a translation pending since may (sigh) and I don't
want to mess up with branches
2014-11-01 10:32 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni :
> Considering the frequent reports sent in this list about errors in the
> german documentation and then forwarded to the translation list, what about
> adding a link to the translation list in the doc footer?
>
> Currently the footer is:
> We welcome you
Considering the frequent reports sent in this list about errors in the
german documentation and then forwarded to the translation list, what
about adding a link to the translation list in the doc footer?
Currently the footer is:
We welcome your aid; please help us by reporting errors to our bug
19 matches
Mail list logo
