Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

2014-07-13 Thread James
On 13/07/14 15:21, David Kastrup wrote: > James writes: > >> On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Helge Kruse writes: >>> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: > 4q > Well, just write the latter version. Well. this means "don't use q when you have accid

Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

2014-07-13 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, > At some point of time, one just has to accept that q is a shorthand. > Once it becomes hard figuring out the proper semantics, we are leaving > the shorthand realm. Point taken… But to imply that coming up with a logically consistent interpretation of each possibility is disingenuou

Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

2014-07-13 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi all, > >> "chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals". That’s >> pretty straightforward. > > Of course [because it’s 'common sense’], I agree this should be the default > behaviour… > But I think it would be nice if there were still a way to ov

Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

2014-07-13 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, > "chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals". That’s > pretty straightforward. Of course [because it’s 'common sense’], I agree this should be the default behaviour… But I think it would be nice if there were still a way to override that, e.g., q! and q? to repeat

Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

2014-07-13 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote: >> Helge Kruse writes: >> >>> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: >>> 4q Well, just write the latter version. >>> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord". >> Reminder or forced accidenta

Re: merging philomelos musicxml2ly-dev

2014-07-13 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, James wrote: I have no preferences either way - we have done this for articulate.ly for instance - but unless we know that philomelos and LilyPond's versions are reasonably close to start with we could end up with each version becoming so far apart in terms of codebase tha

Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

2014-07-13 Thread James
On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote: > Helge Kruse writes: > >> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup: >> >>> 4q >>> Well, just write the latter version. >> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord". > Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear. > >>

Re: merging philomelos musicxml2ly-dev

2014-07-13 Thread James
On 13/07/14 13:36, Federico Bruni wrote: > 2014-07-11 0:20 GMT+02:00 James >: > > I'm not sure a single tracker to 'keep track of progress' is that > useful > for the long term vs. say a tracker each time we get a fix or patch > submitted, I don't mind hel

Re: merging philomelos musicxml2ly-dev

2014-07-13 Thread Federico Bruni
2014-07-11 0:20 GMT+02:00 James : > I'm not sure a single tracker to 'keep track of progress' is that useful > for the long term vs. say a tracker each time we get a fix or patch > submitted, I don't mind helping test/push fixes through our normal > processes, I just don't have the programming ski