2014-02-26 10:37 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>:
> 2014-02-26 9:52 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni :
>
> A snippet which says that you can use Staff and TabStaff together doesn't
>> make sense.
>>
> I don't see what you mean. If that make sense or not is not the aim
Paul Morris wrote
> But what it says at the top of that page is a little different:
>
> "Lily sometimes rejects explicit \break and \pageBreak commands. There are
> two commands to override this behavior:"
>
> If that is the more accurate account of what these commands do, then they
> don't reall
Hello,
On 26/02/14 18:00, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Dear All,
I'm glad to inform you that all snippets have been checked updated/upgraded
since yestreday night.
2 exceptions :
- "Free Meter - increasing the barnumber" (no solution found yet).
- "Hymn Template for per-voice music and \partco
On 27/02/14 10:30, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 27.02.2014 09:16, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
For the sake of reference: The source of the problem seems to have
been identified:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-02/msg00238.html
So does this need a LilyPond Tracker
Yes, definitely.
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
> 2014-02-15 20:14 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>
>>
>> Fixing this seems tricky as measurePos no longer is advanced and cannot
>> serve as an indicator whether or not one has already bumped the bar
>> number. Ideas?
>>
>>
> What will happend if I send this snippet as
Am 27.02.2014 09:16, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
For the sake of reference: The source of the problem seems to have
been identified:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-02/msg00238.html
So does this need a LilyPond Tracker
Yes, definitely.
or is this a bug (in fontforge?)?
I
2014-02-15 20:14 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>
> Fixing this seems tricky as measurePos no longer is advanced and cannot
> serve as an indicator whether or not one has already bumped the bar
> number. Ideas?
>
>
What will happend if I send this snippet as it is within the tarball ?
Paul Morris wrote Tuesday, February 25, 2014 7:44 PM
> That means that this statement is potentially misleading:
>
> "Lily sometimes rejects explicit \break and \pageBreak commands. There are
> two commands to override this behavior:"
Well, Lily does sometimes reject explicit breaks, for exampl
>> For the sake of reference: The source of the problem seems to have
>> been identified:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-02/msg00238.html
>
> So does this need a LilyPond Tracker
Yes, definitely.
> or is this a bug (in fontforge?)?
It's basically a bug in fontforge, bu
James writes:
> On 25/02/14 08:42, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 24.02.2014 22:36, schrieb Karol Majewski:
>>> \version "2.19.2"
>>>
>>> #(set-global-staff-size 18)
>>>
>>> \clef treble
>>>
>>
>> For the sake of reference: The source of the problem seems to have
>> been identified:
>> http://lists.gnu.o
10 matches
Mail list logo