Eluze writes:
> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know how
> to specify it)
>
> what's the risk of using the unquoted form:
>
> \remove Bar_engraver
>
> instead of
>
> \remove "Bar_engraver"
The CG
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lily
Hi Squad,
The following snippet :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=335
is obsolete and doubled with :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=827
Candidate for deletion ?
Cheers,
Pierre
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu
my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know how
to specify it)
what's the risk of using the unquoted form:
\remove Bar_engraver
instead of
\remove "Bar_engraver"
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/why-are-all-engr
2014-02-20 14:28 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
Fine by me! Thanks again for taking the time to do this -- it's a great
> service.
>
You're welcome David !
2014-02-20 14:30 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes :
LGTM. Think you should remove the commented-out block before updating
> this.
OK Phil, done.
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message
news:CAPHOTuUX36e=-xkr-voMcWBeH5CtyfC_M-RW_bhsPt=+wer...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi Bug Squad,
Enhancement for the following snippet :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=721
has been disscussed here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/So-slashed-beamed-gr
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bug Squad,
>
> Enhancement for the following snippet :
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=721
>
> has been disscussed here:
>
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/So-slashed-be
OK
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I don't know, to be honest. I wouldn't do that - I guess either it will happen
automatically, or we can accept a typo in the file name.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: bug-lilypond
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:2
Hi Phil,
2014-02-20 11:10 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes :
> Fixed now.
>
>
Does it mean that I have to rename the file "
setting-the-minimum-length-of-a-fall-doit.ly" ?
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:...
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in
message
news:caphotuxqa53q9whujtejo_la+kf4-cr4cpdhx7tkktfoxnd...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi Squad,
In Contributor’s Guide, 5.3.4 LilyPond formatting (#Tweaks)
please change example for v2.18 syntax :
" Tweaks should, if po
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message
news:caphotuxqa53q9whujtejo_la+kf4-cr4cpdhx7tkktfoxnd...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi Squad,
In Contributor’s Guide, 5.3.4 LilyPond formatting (#Tweaks)
please change example for v2.18 syntax :
" Tweaks should, if possible, also occur on their own line.
not:
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message
news:caphotuvvcjxyho2efe-5tycfd_a-acpugcauopoymsrsvx5...@mail.gmail.com...
Dear Bug Squad,
there's a typo in the title of the following snippet :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=565
please change it for "Setting the minimum length of a fall/doit"
T
"Graham King" wrote in message
news:1392885920.9801.10.ca...@oberon.tremagi.org.uk...
Is there a policy about the persistence of snippet numbering? I suspect
I'm not alone in adding to my scores comments such as: "% see snippet
999"
I suppose a more neutral question is: "What is the recommende
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message
news:CAPHOTuVMDViYi=t45zzgdz-os0hek_gqfdj72hr_t1pepqs...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi Bug Squad,
The following snippet seems obsolete to me (v2.10 I gess)
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=200
Cheers,
Pierre
Agreed
--
Phil Holmes
___
kurivaim wrote
> In ../ly/performer-init.ly (file version 2.17.14, distributed with
> LilyPond version 2.18.0), at line 186 (in the NullVoice block), there is a
> typo.
>
> The file reads:
>
> \type "Performer_Group"
>
> But this should be:
>
> \type "Performer_group"
>
> The erroneous
Is there a policy about the persistence of snippet numbering? I suspect
I'm not alone in adding to my scores comments such as: "% see snippet
999"
I suppose a more neutral question is: "What is the recommended long-term
way to refer to a snippet?"
thanks
-- Graham
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 23:26 +0
Dear Bug Squad,
there's a typo in the title of the following snippet :
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=565
please change it for "Setting the minimum length of a fall/doit"
Thanks,
Pierre
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lis
17 matches
Mail list logo