Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> The removal of the snippet is worth an issue.
>
> The updating/removal of the snippet - which do people think is better?
imo it's worth to mention that you can force the opening repeat bracket to
show.
another topic is the behavior of rehearsal marks with the first bar li
"Eluze" wrote in message
news:1389375421646-157589.p...@n5.nabble.com...
Federico Bruni-5 wrote
???
It's the default in lilypond and the reason why this snippet was added.
In
2.16 the overrides were needed to print the opening bar; in 2.18 it is no
longer needed, so this snippet should be rem
Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> ???
> It's the default in lilypond and the reason why this snippet was added. In
> 2.16 the overrides were needed to print the opening bar; in 2.18 it is no
> longer needed, so this snippet should be removed from 2.18 doc.
yep - you're right and I was a little confused wh
Il 10/gen/2014 16:41 "Eluze" ha scritto:
>
> Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> > If you comment the code in this snippet the result is the same:
> >
> > \version "2.18.0"
> >
> > \relative c'' {
> > %{ \once \override Score.BreakAlignment.break-align-orders =
> > #(make-vector 3 '(instrument-name
> >
Federico Bruni-5 wrote
> If you comment the code in this snippet the result is the same:
>
> \version "2.18.0"
>
> \relative c'' {
> %{ \once \override Score.BreakAlignment.break-align-orders =
> #(make-vector 3 '(instrument-name
> left-edge
> ambi
"Sergio" wrote in message
news:loom.20140110t105225-...@post.gmane.org...
I'm not top posting
If printed alone, the two parts of Flutes and Trumpets are ok, but if I
merge them into a score the result is ugly.
This is too much music to check, but my guess is you need to read
http://lilypond
> I'm not top posting
If printed alone, the two parts of Flutes and Trumpets are ok, but if I
merge them into a score the result is ugly.
%%
% PART: Flutes, OK IF ALONE
%%
\version "2.18.0"
PbMusic= {
% Bar 1
\clef treble \key ees \major \time 2/4
R2
|
