I responded to the issue. Copying the response here as well.
The page is indeed about the Great Highland Bagpipes so the text at
the top should be changed to: "LilyPond contains special definitions
for writing music for the Great Highland Bagpipe", or something
similar.
The manual uses "nominally
On 9 Oct 2013, at 00:43, Colin Campbell wrote:
> Reported as Issue 3605: DOC: Bagpipe.ly corrections needed
Great! Yes, it looks like it is about GHB. Perhaps the file should have been
called GHB.ly.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.o
On 13-10-07 02:23 AM, Hans Aberg wrote:
The GHB or Great Highland Bagpipe, is tuned in A mixolydian, often considerably higher than the standard
pitch, up towards A = 480 Hz. The manual [1], "Bagpipes", 2.6.2, calls it D major, and omits the
"Great" in the name of the bagpipe. Cf. [2], and net-
Am 08.10.2013 11:24, schrieb David Kastrup:
Eluze writes:
nostalgically, I keep track of LilyPond files' history by inserting a
commented version number.
this is updated too - bug or intention (or just nitpicks)?
Note that (Texinfo style) outcommented version numbers are also used in
docume
Eluze writes:
> nostalgically, I keep track of LilyPond files' history by inserting a
> commented version number.
>
> this is updated too - bug or intention (or just nitpicks)?
Note that (Texinfo style) outcommented version numbers are also used in
documented files.
Why don't you just write
%
nostalgically, I keep track of LilyPond files' history by inserting a
commented version number.
this is updated too - bug or intention (or just nitpicks)?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-updates-commented-version-numbers-tp151980.html
S
