Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Eluze writes: > Phil Holmes-2 wrote >> That's quite weird, since the > is a DOS redirection, so shouldn't affect >> the output of convert-ly. What about trying python convert-ly.py instead? > > all the same > > > dak wrote >>> yes, with the option -e, and also dir > dir.txt >> >> And without o

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Phil Holmes-2 wrote > That's quite weird, since the > is a DOS redirection, so shouldn't affect > the output of convert-ly. What about trying python convert-ly.py instead? all the same dak wrote >> yes, with the option -e, and also dir > dir.txt > > And without option -e (the output should th

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Eluze writes: > Phil Holmes-2 wrote >> " >> I presume convert-ly runs OK without the > redirect? Does dir > dir.txt >> work OK? > > yes, with the option -e, and also dir > dir.txt And without option -e (the output should then just be on-screen)? -- David Kastrup ___

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

"Eluze" wrote in message news:1376667481528-149301.p...@n5.nabble.com... Phil Holmes-2 wrote " I presume convert-ly runs OK without the > redirect? Does dir > dir.txt work OK? yes, with the option -e, and also dir > dir.txt Eluze That's quite weird, since the > is a DOS redirection, so s

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Phil Holmes-2 wrote > " > I presume convert-ly runs OK without the > redirect? Does dir > dir.txt > work OK? yes, with the option -e, and also dir > dir.txt Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/convert-ly-from-the-commandline-under-windows-corrupted-t

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

"Eluze" wrote in message news:1376665099015-149299.p...@n5.nabble.com... I forgot to mention the fact that mynewfile.ly is emptied if there was some content in it and saved with 0 Bytes! hence I conclude it is not an access problem. I don't know what further information could be helpful - here

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

I forgot to mention the fact that mynewfile.ly is emptied if there was some content in it and saved with 0 Bytes! hence I conclude it is not an access problem. I don't know what further information could be helpful - here is the python version: Python 2.4.5 (#1, Mar 11 2013, 11:08:29) [GCC 4.1.1

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

"Eluze" wrote in message news:1376661753043-149297.p...@n5.nabble.com... Phil Holmes-2 wrote "Eluze" < eluzew@ > wrote in message news: 1376651267219-149284.post@.nabble ... following the instructions in AU: "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Phil Holmes-2 wrote > "Eluze" < > eluzew@ > > wrote in message > news: > 1376651267219-149284.post@.nabble > ... >> following the instructions in AU: >> >> "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded >> file, preserving the original file and name unchanged, use >>

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Hello, On 16 August 2013 13:13, Eluze wrote: > Phil Holmes-2 wrote > > I think Windows 7 changed the permissions on some directories - > > particularly > > the "Program Files" directories. It was an attempt to stop malware > > writing > > to these directories. What happens if you try convert-

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Phil Holmes-2 wrote > I think Windows 7 changed the permissions on some directories - > particularly > the "Program Files" directories. It was an attempt to stop malware > writing > to these directories. What happens if you try convert-ly myfile.ly > > c:\ANewDirectory\mynewfile.ly I'm on dri

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

"Eluze" wrote in message news:1376651267219-149284.p...@n5.nabble.com... following the instructions in AU: "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded file, preserving the original file and name unchanged, use convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly " I get (under win

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

hello, On 16 August 2013 12:07, Eluze wrote: > following the instructions in AU: > > "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded > file, preserving the original file and name unchanged, use > > convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly > " > > I get (under windows 7) > >

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

dak wrote > Eluze < > eluzew@ > > writes: > >> convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly >> " > I don't know anything about the Windows command line. What happens if > you remove the space between > and mynewfile.ly ? I tried all variations - same result - Eluze -- View this message in context:

Re: convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

Eluze writes: > following the instructions in AU: > > "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded > file, preserving the original file and name unchanged, use > > convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly > " > > I get (under windows 7) > > > close failed: [Errno 9] Bad fi

convert-ly from the commandline under windows corrupted?

following the instructions in AU: "Alternatively, if you want to specify a different name for the upgraded file, preserving the original file and name unchanged, use convert-ly myfile.ly > mynewfile.ly " I get (under windows 7) close failed: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor with an older versio