On Sat, 04 May 2013 22:14:52 -0700, Jay Anderson wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
I cannot reproduce the full problem. Has anyone seen LilyPond print
'annotate-spacing' output where both the limits for the top staff are
negative numbers?
I figured out where this wa
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
> I cannot reproduce the full problem. Has anyone seen LilyPond print
> 'annotate-spacing' output where both the limits for the top staff are
> negative numbers?
I figured out where this was coming from. I was using something like
\score << { l
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> I think that our current code balks at setting paper sizes like "A4"
> rather than "a4". Can someone check with older versions?
>
At least since 2.12, LilyPond has responded
warning: Unknown paper size: A4
but continued to process the input.
_
On Wed, 01 May 2013 21:34:46 -0700, wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013 21:07:52 -0700, Jay Anderson wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
Nothing was intended to change page-breaking between those versions.
However, almost anything changing layout will change the page-breakin
On Wed, 01 May 2013 21:34:46 -0700, wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013 21:07:52 -0700, Jay Anderson wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
Nothing was intended to change page-breaking between those versions.
However, almost anything changing layout will change the page-breakin
I think that our current code balks at setting paper sizes like "A4"
rather than "a4". Can someone check with older versions?
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
