2012/10/5 Thomas Morley :
> AFAIK, the LSR is an associated project, not part of the source in any way.
> So why start a new issue?
Forgot that the LSR provides files (tagged docs), which are imported
into the documentation.
So it _is_ part of LilyPond in some way.
But because the images are not
2012/10/4 Eluze :
[...]
> I consider the LSR a valuable addition to the regular LilyPond and I have
> used a lot of those snippets - sometimes I changed a little bit sometimes I
> used the original. now if I can't use the solutions I have elaborated some
> time ago - and I believe many other users
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:17:05PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 01:32 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >ok, so you won't mind volunteering to take care of this with your
> >personal email account.
>
> Look, the whole point of what I was suggesting was this: that it
> would be
Thomas Morley wrote
> seems you *really* want the LSR at 2.16. :)
I consider the LSR a valuable addition to the regular LilyPond and I have
used a lot of those snippets - sometimes I changed a little bit sometimes I
used the original. now if I can't use the solutions I have elaborated some
time ag
Jonas
On 2 Oct 2012, at 20:02, Jonas Müthing wrote:
> Hello dear Lilypond-developers
>
> When typing the following code the span bar at the line break disappears:
>
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff <<
>\new Staff {
> b'1 b'
> \stopStaff
> \break
> \startStaff
> b' b'
Hello dear Lilypond-developers
When typing the following code the span bar at the line break
disappears:
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff {
b'1 b'
\stopStaff
\break
\startStaff
b' b'
}
\new Staff {
b'1 b'
\break
b' b'
}
On 10/04/2012 01:32 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
ok, so you won't mind volunteering to take care of this with your
personal email account.
Look, the whole point of what I was suggesting was this: that it would be useful
for the Lilypond team to be _automatically_ notified when a downstream bug g
Hey all,
middle syllables aligned to slurred notes are swallowed by musicxml2ly i.e.
they get lost during the conversion e.g.:
middle
la
Test file:
https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-musicxml2ly-dev/blob/mast
Hello,
On 3 October 2012 23:40, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi Eluze,
>
> seems you *really* want the LSR at 2.16. :)
>
> There are two reasons not to update now:
> a) 2.16. not in distros (already under discussion here and in an other thread)
That's not a reason. LSR has never been synchronized wi
