Lars,
There seem to be a lot of issues out there already about ugly slurs. Rather
than create a new issue, I've added yours as a comment to the following
issue:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?cursor=lilypond%3A2411&q=ugly%20slur&ts=1339293358&updated=2411
You can follow it from ther
Issue has been added to the tracker as:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2592&thanks=2592&ts=1339293009
Mark
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> In notation/fretted-strings.itely there are the following index entries:
>
> ##**##
Colin,
I just read through this, and I think it is over my head as far as creating
issues as suggested by David. I'll pass on this one hoping someone more
competent untangles the threads to create issues as needed.
Mark
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Sami Amiris wrote:
>
> > If you have found s
Il 07/06/2012 11:21, m...@apollinemike.com ha scritto:
On 7 juin 2012, at 07:36, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il 04/06/2012 09:11, m...@apollinemike.com ha scritto:
On 4 juin 2012, at 08:05, David Kastrup wrote:
Federico Bruni writes:
Another report about slurs and TabStaff.
IIUC, now slurs co
> I'm not top posting.
Dear friends from LilyPond,
you'll find a bug of an ugly slur in version 2.15.39,
which doesn't exist in 2.14.2.
Hope you'll find a way to fix it.
Example:
\version "2.15.29"
<<
{<>}\\
% Slur is ugly.
% There was no problem with that in version "2.14.2"
{a4( ges f
In notation/fretted-strings.itely there are the following index entries:
##
@cindex harmonic indications in tablature notation
@cindex tablature and harmonic indications
@cindex slides in tablature notation
@cindex tablature and slid
