On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:06:37AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Contemporary vibrato is a total hack (it was one of the 1st things I wrote
> > in LilyPond). It's a miracle that it ever compiled in the first place. I
> > have a 2.15-friendly version I've been using lying around somewhere that
Am 3. April 2012 01:51 schrieb m...@apollinemike.com :
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seba just informed me that the "Contemporary vibrato" snippet is not
>> compiling.
>>
>
> Contemporary vibrato is a total hack (it was one of the 1st things I wrote in
> LilyPo
On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seba just informed me that the "Contemporary vibrato" snippet is not
> compiling.
>
Contemporary vibrato is a total hack (it was one of the 1st things I wrote in
LilyPond). It's a miracle that it ever compiled in the first place. I
Hi,
Seba just informed me that the "Contemporary vibrato" snippet is not compiling.
(1) I tested again compiling the whole lsr with:
#!/bin/bash
for LILYFILE in *.ly
do
STEM=$(basename "$LILYFILE" .ly)
echo "running $LILYFILE..."
lilypond --format=png -ddelete-intermediate-files "$LILYFIL
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "Ralph Palmer" wrote in message
> news:CAHr6eSpqtmwStwqj2K5R5_**nwwk=ZuXFs9saHiL8r-3Da+cBHzA@**
> mail.gmail.com...
>
> Hi, All -
>>
>> I will be out of town and out of touch on Monday, April 9. Can someone
>> please cover for me?
>>
>> I app
