Mike, Phil,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:16 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2011, at 12:06 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
>
>> Status: Accepted
>> Owner:
>> Labels: Type-Critical Regression
>>
>> New issue 1971 by philehol...@gmail.com: Slashed flags no longer work
>> http://c
On Oct 17, 2011, at 12:43 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:02:22PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>
>> I think that by running convert-ly via the script in 10.9.4,
>> duplicate Flag #'transparent statements will be issued (every
>> time convert-ly sees a Stem #'transp
On Oct 16, 2011, at 12:06 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
> Status: Accepted
> Owner:
> Labels: Type-Critical Regression
>
> New issue 1971 by philehol...@gmail.com: Slashed flags no longer work
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1971
>
> The NR
> (http://lilypond.org/
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #21 on issue 1926 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: 2.15.12 processing speed
problems
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1926
The only outstanding comments are to push as two commits, and it is pretty
clear how the commit
Comment #2 on issue 1972 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Seg fault and 100% CPU
when using \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'ledger-positions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1972
Clearly this is due to the change for issue 1193 so I've put a link here in
a comment on Reitveld for tha
Comment #1 on issue 1962 by brownian@gmail.com: Visible gap in span bar
when making lyrics to avoid bar lines
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1962
As many lyrics lines, as many gaps.
I've not marked it as critical, because i am too late -- 2.14 already had
this (this
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 1973 by percival.music...@gmail.com: Enhancement
request: add ability to create wav/mp3
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1973
Creating audio is not the task of lilypond; that is the job of other
projects. You already me
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement
New issue 1973 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement request: add ability
to create wav/mp3
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1973
I use lilypond to create practise tracks for a couple of the choirs willing
to put up wit
Comment #1 on issue 1972 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Seg fault and 100% CPU when
using \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'ledger-positions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1972
% this also produces stuck 100% CPU at 'Drawing systems...'
\version "2.15.13"
\relative c' {
\override St
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Crash
New issue 1972 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Seg fault and 100% CPU when using
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'ledger-positions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1972
Reported by James Lowe:
% this produces a segfault
\version "2.15.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:02:22PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
> I think that by running convert-ly via the script in 10.9.4,
> duplicate Flag #'transparent statements will be issued (every
> time convert-ly sees a Stem #'transparent, it adds a Flag
> #'transparent for files created befo
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
> This looks to me like correct behaviour. You've created extra Lyrics
> contexts, and Lilypond stacks them one above the other. This is as
> illustrated in the NR. If I was doing what you're showing, I would use
> \skip:
>
> <<
> \new Staff {
> \new Voice = "
On Oct 16, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:13:27PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to run convert-ly on the docs to eliminate this sorta problem?
>
> Yes. By some incredible coincidence, it is discussed
> in CG 10.9.4 Automatically
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:13:27PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
> Is there a way to run convert-ly on the docs to eliminate this sorta problem?
Yes. By some incredible coincidence, it is discussed
in CG 10.9.4 Automatically update documentation
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentatio
Comment #22 on issue 1701 by percival.music...@gmail.com: default
accidental style prints too many 'extra' naturals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1701
no more 2.14 releases are planned. Let the translators deal with the
change.
__
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #8 on issue 1951 by percival.music...@gmail.com: Scripts collide
with accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1951#c8
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
On Oct 16, 2011, at 4:49 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> "Stan Sanderson" wrote in message
> news:0d770350-3bf2-4555-8f4c-ee7b5d86c...@gmail.com...
>> Sad to report that LilyPond v 2.15.14-1 fails to run on my iMac. Error
>> report follows below.
>> As previously reported, v 2.15.8 is the last vers
Comment #5 on issue 1943 by stans...@gmail.com: lilypond after 2.15.8 fails
on x86 Macs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1943
I downloaded
http://klarinett.li/lilypond/lilypond-2.15.14-1.darwin-x86-no64.tar.bz2 and
expanded it. Unfortunately, I am getting the same error
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Comment #3 on issue 1912 by d...@gnu.org: Horizontal spacing depends on
stem 'direction
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1912
Closed in line with comment #2. May be reopened if evidence is brought
forward that t
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-Postponed Type-Ugly
Comment #4 on issue 625 by pkx1...@gmail.com: lilypond -dpreview ignores
extent of bracket unless another outside staff object is nearby
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=625
This seems to be an issue st
Comment #4 on issue 1943 by chh...@gmail.com: lilypond after 2.15.8 fails
on x86 Macs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1943
Ok, I have stripped the x86_64 parts from the application. In theory it
should now work on 10.5 too. Unfortunately, I have no access to such a
syst
Updates:
Owner: ---
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-Medium Type-Ugly
Comment #2 on issue 637 by pkx1...@gmail.com: keep-inside-line doesn't
affect crescendoText
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=637
Still an issue in 2.15.15.
Attachments:
2_15_15.
Updates:
Summary: merge-differently-headed should work for more than just two
voices
Owner: ---
Labels: -Priority-Low
Comment #8 on issue 202 by pkx1...@gmail.com: merge-differently-headed
should work for more than just two voices
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issu
Updates:
Summary: Ties from different voices must be handled on the staff level to
avoid clashes with notes
Owner: ---
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-Postponed Type-Ugly
Comment #6 on issue 458 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Ties from different voices
must be handled on the staf
Updates:
Summary: Outside-staff placement of hairpins is 'too approximate'
Owner: ---
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-Medium Type-Ugly
Comment #2 on issue 584 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Outside-staff placement of
hairpins is 'too approximate'
http://code.google.com/p/lil
Updates:
Owner: ---
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-Low Type-Ugly
Comment #4 on issue 609 by pkx1...@gmail.com: wrong placement of \markup on
MultiMeasureRest
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=609
The results of 2.15.15 are attached.
Attached to skips (wo
Updates:
Owner: ---
Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Ugly
Comment #2 on issue 556 by pkx1...@gmail.com: fingeringOrientations affects
cross-voices arpeggio
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=556
Still an issue for 2.15.15 - with some very subtle diffe
Updates:
Summary: "Moment is not increasing" when combining Lyrics in a sequential
way
Owner: ---
Labels: -Priority-Medium
Comment #5 on issue 702 by pkx1...@gmail.com: "Moment is not increasing"
when combining Lyrics in a sequential way
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/is
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new -Fixed_2_15_14 fixed_2_15_14
Comment #16 on issue 1855 by tdaniels...@gmail.com: Prevents nested tuplets
from colliding
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1855
(No comment was entered for this change.)
_
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new
Comment #16 on issue 1846 by tdaniels...@gmail.com: Improves horizontal
spacing of axis groups that SpanBar grobs traverse
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1846
(No comment was entered for this change.)
__
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Low -Patch-push fixed_2_15_14
Comment #14 on issue 1812 by tdaniels...@gmail.com: NR Context Layout Order
rewrite (5.1.7)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1812
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium -Patch-push fixed_2_15_15
Comment #8 on issue 1778 by tdaniels...@gmail.com: slashedGrace function
(graces with slashed stems but no slur, e.g. when grace is tied) needs
documenting
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1778
(No comment
Comment #18 on issue 1110 by d...@gnu.org: Wrong octave of repetition chord
with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
While we are at it: what is the desired output of
\parallelMusic #'(A B) { 1 | | q | q |}
\new Voice { << \relative c' \A \\ \re
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_15
Comment #22 on issue 307 by tdaniels...@gmail.com: collision slur with
tuplet bracket
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=307
Mike says: [Fixed] by increasing the slur region based on the height of the
ext
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium -Syntax fixed_2_15_13
Comment #3 on issue 1403 by tdaniels...@gmail.com: Enhancement: defining
postfix commands in Scheme.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1403
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #4 on issue 451 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement: a more flexible
\parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=451
You can put a \relative around the _uses_ of the identifiers \parallelMusic
defines, and this will work as expected, wi
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Comment #2 on issue 1403 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement: defining postfix
commands in Scheme.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1403
define-event-function has been implemented with commit
5aac8e8d8e2b1fc490354cba2cdec
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 1970 by pkx1...@gmail.com: string-tunings-init.scm does
not exist
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1970
Pushed as
commit 969556627f76d211db81bd8b5de780f2d179445
Thought this was trivial en
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 12:29:14 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>> >> It is extremely helpful in writing keyboard music.
>> >
>> > Typing aids are the kind of thing that editor macros should do rather
>> > than the music processor.
>>
>> Here I strongly disagree. Th
Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 12:29:14 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> >> It is extremely helpful in writing keyboard music.
> >
> > Typing aids are the kind of thing that editor macros should do rather
> > than the music processor.
>
> Here I strongly disagree. There must be means to make LilyPond's
>> It is extremely helpful in writing keyboard music.
>
> Typing aids are the kind of thing that editor macros should do rather
> than the music processor.
Here I strongly disagree. There must be means to make LilyPond's
`source code' readable by people also which don't use an editor's
special l
On Oct 16, 2011, at 12:06 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
> Status: Accepted
> Owner:
> Labels: Type-Critical Regression
>
> New issue 1971 by philehol...@gmail.com: Slashed flags no longer work
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1971
>
> The NR
> (http://lilypond.org/
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Critical Regression
New issue 1971 by philehol...@gmail.com: Slashed flags no longer work
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1971
The NR
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns)says:
"The slash
"Stan Sanderson" wrote in message
news:0d770350-3bf2-4555-8f4c-ee7b5d86c...@gmail.com...
Sad to report that LilyPond v 2.15.14-1 fails to run on my iMac. Error
report follows below.
As previously reported, v 2.15.8 is the last version to run successfully.
The previously suggested workaround was
"Federico Bruni" wrote in message
news:4e99bacb.7010...@gmail.com...
I think I've found a bug in the doc:
Notation Reference 2.4.3
In the "See also" subsection there is:
"Installed Files: ‘scm/string-tunings-init.scm’ contains predefined banjo
tunings."
That file doesn't exist.
AFAIK, the f
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation
New issue 1970 by philehol...@gmail.com: string-tunings-init.scm does not
exist
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1970
Reported by Federico Bruni:
Notation Reference 2.4.3
In the "See also" subsection there is:
"Instal
"Patrick Schmidt" wrote in message
news:f28f3dd7-1cc7-495c-aeff-0b1de3b2d...@gmx.de...
Hi Reinhold,
the values "above" and "below" of the 'placement'-attribute don't seem to
show any effect in the -element, e.g. when you substitute
"below" for "above" in the following code the result of the c
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Scripts
New issue 1969 by philehol...@gmail.com: Placement attribute in MusicXML
has no effect
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1969
Reported by Patrick Schmidt:
the values "above" and "below" of the 'placement'-attribute don't seem
"-Eluze" wrote in message
news:32622828.p...@talk.nabble.com...
with the following code - derived from the example in NR under Lyrics and
Repeats - the text of the 2nd lyric voice is not correctly aligned.
this seems to happen when such repeats occur on the same line/system only.
Eluze
<<
\
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> I don't actually like the q feature at all, [...]
>
> Why not?
It is ill-defined (as you can see from the examples I posted) and makes
music much less machine-readable.
> It is extremely helpful in writing keyboard music.
Typing aids are the kind of thing that editor
Comment #17 on issue 1110 by d...@gnu.org: Wrong octave of repetition chord
with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
Getting back to comment #11 from Werner:
IMHO, q is such a useful feature that even a `heavy' solution would be
worth to implem
> I don't actually like the q feature at all, [...]
Why not? It is extremely helpful in writing keyboard music. That it
is a syntactically difficult issue and causes implementation headaches
is something different...
Werner
___
bug-lilypond mai
Comment #16 on issue 1110 by lemzw...@gmail.com: Wrong octave of repetition
chord with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
Oh, yes, *now* I remember the whole discussion... Good morning, brain :-)
___
Peekay Ex writes:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
>>
>> Comment #14 on issue 1110 by lemzw...@gmail.com: Wrong octave of repetition
>> chord with \relative and #{ #} syntax
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
>>
>> Maybe I'm naïve, but shouldn't q be processed m
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
>
> Comment #14 on issue 1110 by lemzw...@gmail.com: Wrong octave of repetition
> chord with \relative and #{ #} syntax
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
>
> Maybe I'm naïve, but shouldn't q be processed much earlier? What w
Comment #15 on issue 1110 by d...@gnu.org: Wrong octave of repetition chord
with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
Yes, you are naive. q is processed much earlier, in the lexer and parser.
But do you really want to have
\relative c' { q }
Comment #14 on issue 1110 by lemzw...@gmail.com: Wrong octave of repetition
chord with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110
Maybe I'm naïve, but shouldn't q be processed much earlier? What we really
want IMHO is a shorthand at the input level t
57 matches
Mail list logo
