Re: Issue 1694 in lilypond: Modifies Spanner::spanner_length to better handle line-spanners

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #4 on issue 1694 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Modifies Spanner::spanner_length to better handle line-spanners http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1694 verified 2.15.3 ___ bug-lilypond mailing l

Re: Issue 1697 in lilypond: Add ties from Completion_note_heads_engraver to a TieColumn

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #6 on issue 1697 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Add ties from Completion_note_heads_engraver to a TieColumn http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1697 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___

Re: Slurs ignore intermediary cross-staff notes

2011-06-28 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-06-28 11:00 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote: Greetings Bug Squad, I've been looking at the tracker and known issues, but I couldn't find this one. Is this considered normal behavior? \version "2.15.3" << \new Staff = "up" { s1 } \new Staff = "down" \relative c' { c8( \chang

Issue 1718 in lilypond: Slur collides with cross-staff stems

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Collision Priority-High New issue 1718 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Slur collides with cross-staff stems http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718 Reported by Valentin Villenave: I've been looking at the tracker and known issues, but I coul

Re: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond 2.14.1

2011-06-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> There's nothing attached, but it's in git: > db6910b2913115769ba736e0b0ff6a159ba4 > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=db6910b2913115769ba736e0b0ff6a159ba4 Thanks. > Unfortunately it just missed the 2.15.3 release, but it will be > included in 2.15.4. Ok.

Re: Issue 1467 in lilypond: [PATCH] Doc: Rewrite NR 3.2 Titles and headers. (issue3667041)

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #8 on issue 1467 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: [PATCH] Doc: Rewrite NR 3.2 Titles and headers. (issue3667041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1467 (No comment was entered for this change.) _

Re: Issue 1014 in lilypond: Full/multi measure rests should be semibreve (for any but 4/2)

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #3 on issue 1014 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Full/multi measure rests should be semibreve (for any but 4/2) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1014 (No comment was entered for this change.) _

Re: Backporting for 2.14.2

2011-06-28 Thread Carl Sorensen
=On 6/28/11 12:30 PM, "Federico Bruni" wrote: > Il giorno lun, 27/06/2011 alle 13.13 -0600, Carl Sorensen ha scritto: >> I'm trying to get ready for release 2.14.2. In general, I'd like >> bugfixes >> from 2.15.x to show up in 2.14.2. > > Carl, > > when v2.14.2 will be released? (more or less)

Re: Issue 1714 in lilypond: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_15_4 Comment #6 on issue 1714 by percival.music.ca: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1714 (No comment was entered for this change.) _

Re: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond 2.14.1

2011-06-28 Thread Marc Payne
(Note: this message is in reply to an existing thread. I just subscribed to the ML. I apologize if this creates a new thread.) Thank you for clarifying the problem surrounding mpost. > Attached is a fix which makes it work again in lilypond (without > breaking backwards compatibility to older mpo

Re: Issue 1714 in lilypond: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 1714 by marc...@gmail.com: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1714 I built lilypond shortly after that commit and had no problems, so I think it's fixed. _

Doc: @snippets links are broken when translated

2011-06-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings everybody, some translated doc pages have broken @snippet links; for example if you follow the link at the bottom of http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-curves.de.html you'll see that it points to http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/snippets/a

Slurs ignore intermediary cross-staff notes

2011-06-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
Greetings Bug Squad, I've been looking at the tracker and known issues, but I couldn't find this one. Is this considered normal behavior? \version "2.15.3" << \new Staff = "up" { s1 } \new Staff = "down" \relative c' { c8( \change Staff = "up" c' c \change Staff = "down"

Re: Issue 1259 in lilypond: DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none doesn't work over \break

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review Comment #2 on issue 1259 by pkx1...@gmail.com: DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none doesn't work over \break http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1259 Passes reg tests - dynamics-alignment-breaker.ly is obviously different as the

Re: Issue 1706 in lilypond: Beaming causes lilypond to crash

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #6 on issue 1706 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Beaming causes lilypond to crash http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1706 In 2.15.3 there still are many error messages (identical to the one quoted in the original post), but Lilypond do

Re: Issue 1643 in lilypond: Part Combine problems

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: fixed_2_15_4 backport Comment #7 on issue 1643 by percival.music.ca: Part Combine problems http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1643 When you push something, you're claiming that it's fixed. The fixed_2_15_4 tag is an unverified claim; that claim is veri

Re: Issue 1643 in lilypond: Part Combine problems

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 1643 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Part Combine problems http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1643 Pushed as 8dec1b16ae6daff5b9a0f9fb806db66cf87bc5bd James PS once this has been verified this can be backported - I assume that the backport flag can only (really) be

Re: Issue 1714 in lilypond: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1714 by percival.music.ca: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1714 this might be fixed in db6910b2913115769ba736e0b0ff6a159ba4 but we're leaving it unmarked for now. The first tarba

Re: Build error regarding mf2pt1 with latest texlive (2011) and lilypond 2.14.1

2011-06-28 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:14:51AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Attached is a fix which makes it work again in lilypond (without > breaking backwards compatibility to older mpost versions), and which > I've applied to the git repository. Please test and report whether it > works so that we can m

Re: Issue 1716 in lilypond: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 1716 by percival.music.ca: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716 Short-term fiat decision (as release meister): absolutely no removing/renaming to syntax in a stable version, even for internal properties.

Re: Issue 1716 in lilypond: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 1716 by pkx1...@gmail.com: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716 +1 At the absolute minimum we aught to be saying [internal function] is no longer supported and will be [ignored/deleted/whatever] please ref

Re: Issue 1716 in lilypond: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655

2011-06-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 1716 by reinhold...@gmail.com: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716 Internal properties are -- as their name already says -- internal and can thus change without warning... On the other hand, as a user I wo