Re: Issue 1504 in lilypond: Feathered beams reset at line break

2011-03-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 1504 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Feathered beams reset at line break http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1504 Mike has uploaded a new patchset at http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057. It applied to my local sandbox, altough there are a couple of trailing wh

Re: Footnotes: empty fill-lines in header & footer

2011-03-13 Thread Mike Solomon
On Mar 13, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: > Le 13 mars 2011 à 19:53, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit : > >> Hi Mike, >> >> First of all, thank you very much for your precious work on footnotes. >> >> The following example demonstrates a strange behavior wrt footnotes: >> >> %% For each empty \

Re: Issue 1558 in lilypond: shorten unbeamed 32nd notes

2011-03-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Labels: -Patch-new fixed_2_13_55 Comment #1 on issue 1558 by percival.music.ca: shorten unbeamed 32nd notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558 pushed. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-li

Re: unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better. (issue4243071)

2011-03-13 Thread Graham Percival
On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote: >>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558 >> >> Looks fine; could you send me the final patch for pushing? > > Here they are. Thanks, pushed. Cheers, - Graham ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@

Re: unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better. (issue4243071)

2011-03-13 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/3/13 Graham Percival : > On 3/13/11, Graham Percival wrote: >> On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote: >>> What's the status of this? >>> I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being >>> counted-down. >>> In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all. >> >> Sorry, added now: >> h

Footnotes: empty fill-lines in header & footer

2011-03-13 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Hi Mike, First of all, thank you very much for your precious work on footnotes. The following example demonstrates a strange behavior wrt footnotes: %% For each empty \fill-line in header and footer markups, %% footnotes together with separation line are added. \version "2.13.54" #(set-default-

Re: unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better. (issue4243071)

2011-03-13 Thread Graham Percival
On 3/13/11, Graham Percival wrote: > On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote: >> What's the status of this? >> I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being >> counted-down. >> In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all. > > Sorry, added now: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issue

Re: unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better. (issue4243071)

2011-03-13 Thread Graham Percival
On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote: > What's the status of this? > I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being > counted-down. > In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all. Sorry, added now: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558 I'll check the regtests once

Issue 1558 in lilypond: shorten unbeamed 32nd notes

2011-03-13 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Patch-new New issue 1558 by percival.music.ca: shorten unbeamed 32nd notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558 unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better http://codereview.appspo

Re: Issue 1530 in lilypond: [PATCH] Fret diagram fixes (Issue 4176056)

2011-03-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2.13.54 Comment #6 on issue 1530 by nicolas@gmail.com: [PATCH] Fret diagram fixes (Issue 4176056) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1530 commit ca9ecc27bcb2816add10360e56f43501de389366

Re: unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better. (issue4243071)

2011-03-13 Thread Jan Warchoł
What's the status of this? I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being counted-down. In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all. cheers, Janek ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi

Re: regression test ‘midi-volume-equaliser.ly’

2011-03-13 Thread Keith OHara
Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk> writes: > > Keith E OHara wrote Friday, March 11, 2011 2:21 AM > > > This is one of LilyPond's regression tests. > > (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/regression/74/lily-c64147c6.ly) > > > > Some changes before 2.13.53 cause all midiInstrument changes to be > > pl