Comment #5 on issue 1504 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Feathered beams reset at
line break
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1504
Mike has uploaded a new patchset at http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057.
It applied to my local sandbox, altough there are a couple of trailing
wh
On Mar 13, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 13 mars 2011 à 19:53, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit :
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> First of all, thank you very much for your precious work on footnotes.
>>
>> The following example demonstrates a strange behavior wrt footnotes:
>>
>> %% For each empty \
Updates:
Status: Verified
Labels: -Patch-new fixed_2_13_55
Comment #1 on issue 1558 by percival.music.ca: shorten unbeamed 32nd notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558
pushed.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-li
On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558
>>
>> Looks fine; could you send me the final patch for pushing?
>
> Here they are.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@
2011/3/13 Graham Percival :
> On 3/13/11, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>>> What's the status of this?
>>> I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being
>>> counted-down.
>>> In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all.
>>
>> Sorry, added now:
>> h
Hi Mike,
First of all, thank you very much for your precious work on footnotes.
The following example demonstrates a strange behavior wrt footnotes:
%% For each empty \fill-line in header and footer markups,
%% footnotes together with separation line are added.
\version "2.13.54"
#(set-default-
On 3/13/11, Graham Percival wrote:
> On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>> What's the status of this?
>> I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being
>> counted-down.
>> In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all.
>
> Sorry, added now:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issue
On 3/13/11, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> What's the status of this?
> I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being
> counted-down.
> In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all.
Sorry, added now:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558
I'll check the regtests once
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Patch-new
New issue 1558 by percival.music.ca: shorten unbeamed 32nd notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1558
unbeamed 32nd stem is shortened by 0.25 ss to fit beamed stems better
http://codereview.appspo
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2.13.54
Comment #6 on issue 1530 by nicolas@gmail.com: [PATCH] Fret diagram
fixes (Issue 4176056)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1530
commit ca9ecc27bcb2816add10360e56f43501de389366
What's the status of this?
I don't see any objections, and also i don't see this pushed or being
counted-down.
In fact, i don't see a patch-issue at all.
cheers,
Janek
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk> writes:
>
> Keith E OHara wrote Friday, March 11, 2011 2:21 AM
>
> > This is one of LilyPond's regression tests.
> > (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/regression/74/lily-c64147c6.ly)
> >
> > Some changes before 2.13.53 cause all midiInstrument changes to be
> > pl
12 matches
Mail list logo