Issue 1461 in lilypond: Unexpected behavior of pitchedTrill within tablature

2010-12-23 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1461 by ColinPKCampbell: Unexpected behavior of pitchedTrill within tablature http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1461 \version "2.13.44" noteTrills = \relative c' { \pitchedTrill c2\startTrillSpan

Re: Can't use \clef inside NoteNames and similar contexts

2010-12-23 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, um 20:25:09 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > In particular, the problem appears not only with NoteNames, but with any > other context that is used without a surrounding staff, i.e. FiguredBass, > ChordNames, etc. The offending code can be found in line 138 of > scm/pa

Re: Can't use \clef inside NoteNames and similar contexts

2010-12-23 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2010, um 16:08:10 schrieb Michael Ellis: > Carl, thanks for taking the time to figure it out! I really appreciate the > help. It's good to know there's a workaround. Yes, there is a workaround (which causes lot of work for you!), but I would regard this as a bug in the

Re: midi2ly

2010-12-23 Thread James Bailey
On Dec 23, 2010, at 8:20 AM, jayc...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm trying to use midi2ly on my MacBook Pro running OSX 10.6.5. > It seems that midi2ly was not compiled properly, as it's saying that > I have the wrong architecture. This despite the fact that I can run > Lilypad just fine (I have the r

Re: Issue 1287 in lilypond: Notation 2.9 Ancient notation does not follow doc policy

2010-12-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1287 by pkx166h: Notation 2.9 Ancient notation does not follow doc policy http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1287 Add @seealso's to itely file Commit 7f2a45dd1f9e2b326282f8be152a916180a85c8c and Commit fcc48a26a65cff0acc26cad55d29b36f42794e8c _

Re: Issue 855 in lilypond: fix the command index

2010-12-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:37:11AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> A long time ago I've seen a demonstration how to count up to 100 (or > >> more) with a single hand. Unfortunately, I've forgotten all details. > > > > hmm... if you use the hand position/orientation, you could "easily" > > add a

Re: assignment to single keys in staff-staff-spacing

2010-12-23 Thread Keith OHara
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:45:58 -0800, Keith OHara wrote: It looks like the ability to assign to single keys broke sometime since 2.13.39 My mistake. VerticalAxisGroup's staff-staff-spacing is by default a function, not an association-list, so it is nonsense to try to set one key. I was thi

assignment to single keys in staff-staff-spacing

2010-12-23 Thread Keith OHara
Dear Bug List, It looks like the ability to assign to single keys broke sometime since 2.13.39 The single-key assignment works for other properties, like nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing; only staff-staff-spacing has the problem. -Keith \version "2.13.42" { << \new Staff \with { \override Ve

Re: Issue 855 in lilypond: fix the command index

2010-12-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> A long time ago I've seen a demonstration how to count up to 100 (or >> more) with a single hand. Unfortunately, I've forgotten all details. > > hmm... if you use the hand position/orientation, you could "easily" > add another 5 bits, which would give 1024. The "left-right" > positions aren't

Re: Issue 855 in lilypond: fix the command index

2010-12-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > of course, I'm a computer scientists, so the number that I can count > > with 5 bits is more than what most people can count with 5 bits. > > A long time ago I've seen a demonstration how to count up to 100 (or > more) with a s

Re: Issue 855 in lilypond: fix the command index

2010-12-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> of course, I'm a computer scientists, so the number that I can count > with 5 bits is more than what most people can count with 5 bits. A long time ago I've seen a demonstration how to count up to 100 (or more) with a single hand. Unfortunately, I've forgotten all details. Werner __

Re: Issue 855 in lilypond: fix the command index

2010-12-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:47 AM, wrote: > > it must have been a significant number of users, or one user > > whom I respected. > > ... Wait, is it snowing in hell already? :-) It might only be one hand (I haven't tried serio

Re: Issue 855 in lilypond: fix the command index

2010-12-23 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:47 AM, wrote: > it must have been a significant number of users, or one user > whom I respected. ... Wait, is it snowing in hell already? :-) Kidding. Get better! Cheers, Valentin. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypon