On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 10.09.2010 06:33, schrieb Jay Anderson:
>>
>> \version "2.13.32"
>>
>> \score
>> {
>> \new Staff \relative c'
>> {
>> %Works fine over break:
>> c1\cresc
>> \break
>> c1\f
>>
>> \override DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #
This bug is now fixed, so there's no need to open an issue.
Thanks,
Carl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hi all,
when voices get very close to one another ledger lines and/or note
heads seem to change their behavior. In the following example the
note head of the c is too far to the right. The ledger lines of the
notes on the left side of the chord are shorter than normal. The
ledger line of
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #19 on issue 894 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails from the
command-line in OSX 10.4
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894
meh, I can't be bothered to wait for a proper verification.
_
On 9/10/10 11:14 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:10:05AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> The message below shows a bug in the autobeaming code.
>>
>> Please mark is as a Defect with High priority (perhaps it should be
>> Critical, rather than high, as it causes an int
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:10:05AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> The message below shows a bug in the autobeaming code.
>
> Please mark is as a Defect with High priority (perhaps it should be
> Critical, rather than high, as it causes an intended new feature not to
> work).
I believe that this fu
The message below shows a bug in the autobeaming code.
Please mark is as a Defect with High priority (perhaps it should be
Critical, rather than high, as it causes an intended new feature not to
work).
Thanks,
Carl
-- Forwarded Message
From: James Worlton
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:35:26 -0
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:32:59AM -0700, Jay Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > Related to this?
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1251
>
> Yep, that's it. I guess I missed it in my searching. Thanks.
Most important is workaround:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Related to this?
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1251
Yep, that's it. I guess I missed it in my searching. Thanks.
-Jay
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 1260 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Crash with \tempo
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1260
Sorry, this is the same as issue #1251.
I didn't find this one because I only searched for open issues (and 1251 is
already fixed as
Am 10.09.2010 07:29, schrieb Jay Anderson:
\version "2.13.32"
\score
{
<<
\new Staff
{
\tempo "Andante" 4=63
R1
}
\new Staff
{
R1
}
>>
\layout
{
}
}
$ lilypond seg.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.32
Processing `seg.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreti
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression
New issue 1260 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Crash with \tempo
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1260
Reported by Jay Anderson:
\version "2.13.32"
\score
{
<<
\new Staff
{
%R1 % inserti
"Jay Anderson" wrote in message
news:aanlkti==7jnywojnvnssd5xniocj5tbfa0cbkwrox...@mail.gmail.com...
\version "2.13.32"
\score
{
<<
\new Staff
{
\tempo "Andante" 4=63
R1
}
\new Staff
{
R1
}
>>
\layout
{
}
}
$ lilypond seg.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.32
Processi
Am 10.09.2010 06:33, schrieb Jay Anderson:
\version "2.13.32"
\score
{
\new Staff \relative c'
{
%Works fine over break:
c1\cresc
\break
c1\f
\override DynamicTextSpanner #'style = #'none
c1\cresc
\break
c1\f
}
}
dts.ly:13:6: programming error:
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low
New issue 1259 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: DynamicTextSpanner #'style =
#'none doesn't work over \break
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1259
\version "2.13.32"
\score
{
\new Staff \relative c'
{
%Works
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low
New issue 1258 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Chord repetition with "q" gives
error when used in tremolo
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1258
\version "2.13.32"
\new Staff \relative c'
{
%Causes error:
8 q q q
Am 10.09.2010 04:27, schrieb Jay Anderson:
\version "2.13.32"
\new Staff \relative c'
{
%Causes error:
8 q q q \repeat tremolo 4 q |
%This works:
%8 q q q \repeat tremolo 4 |
}
Hi Jay,
I don't see why your first statement should be invalid. The docs say:
"The chord repetitio
17 matches
Mail list logo