Learn how to debug and diagnose problems. Computers are not
magic. If it used to work, and now doesn't work, then something
that you changed caused it to stop working.
If you send a proper bug report, we might take a look at it.
- Graham
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:58:56PM +, Mickey wrote:
I had written a program that transforms guitar tablature to Lilypond input
codes for saxophone notes. I was using Lilypond successfully to produce
acrobat and windows media files of saxophone music. I recently tried to use
Lilypond and it has stopped working for my program and also it won't reco
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:34:40PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > I ask because I wrote down a list of 3 regtests that looked broken
> > to me before releasing 2.13.16, but I thought this would be a nice
> > test. :)
>
> Was this one
Hi Carl,
> It seems to me that this is a bug; the fis' and the f' are not the same
> note, and therefore the note-heads should not be merged.
Yes, *that's* the bug (not the accidental handling). =)
For the record, I [quickly] tried a number of shifting attempts, but couldn't
duplicate the orig
The music images in NR 1.1.3 Automatic accidentals are all clipped too tight
on the bottom; the beams on the first notes in the bottom staff are cut off.
Carl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug
On 3/20/10 9:43 AM, "Kieren MacMillan"
wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
>> understood it to mean that when there are 2 notes in 2 voices but which have
>> the same fundamental note, only differing in an accidental, then LilyPond
>> doesn't support this.
>
> Nope -- but we should adjust the documentation if
Hi Phil,
> understood it to mean that when there are 2 notes in 2 voices but which have
> the same fundamental note, only differing in an accidental, then LilyPond
> doesn't support this.
Nope -- but we should adjust the documentation if it's unclear.
> I do have the chords set in different vo
Hi Phil,
> The attached image is how this appears in the Chappell version of "The
> Mikado".
Your example isn't technically a situation where "the same note occurs with two
different accidentals in the same chord" -- it has two different voices!
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:39:14PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Quoting Carl Sorensen :
>
>> On 3/19/10 8:40 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>>
>>> According to the documentation for 2.12.3 "There is no support for chords
>>> where the same note occurs with different accidentals in the same chord." I
Quoting Carl Sorensen :
On 3/19/10 8:40 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
According to the documentation for 2.12.3 "There is no support for chords
where the same note occurs with different accidentals in the same chord." I
have a situation where this is required and would like to add it as an
enhanc
10 matches
Mail list logo
