Comment #1 on issue 979 by percival.music.ca: waf build system
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=979
Work on this is currently stuck because the below doesn't work (waf barfs
when
there's an output file with the same name as the input filename). Somebody
needs to
coordinat
Le 12 févr. 2010 à 22:05, Neil Puttock a écrit :
> On 12 February 2010 04:50, Boris Shingarov wrote:
>
>> Of course, combine-score-stencils needs a real implementation, not just
>> (reverse stencils). But unfortunately, I do not understand what you mean by
>> space-lines. Could you explain in a
On 12 February 2010 21:14, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> Uh oh. Means I have to catch up with the latest master asap, otherwise I am
> producing obsolete, unmergeable code. Funny that I have not seen any
> discussion around this change, even though I am subscribed to -devel, -bug,
> and googlecode.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:14:55PM -0500, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> Uh oh. Means I have to catch up with the latest master asap, otherwise
> I am producing obsolete, unmergeable code. Funny that I have not seen any
> discussion around this change, even though I am subscribed to -devel,
> -bug,
Quoting Neil Puttock :
recent changes to the markup code (not least that there's no
define-builtin-markup-command any more).
Uh oh. Means I have to catch up with the latest master asap, otherwise
I am producing obsolete, unmergeable code.
Funny that I have not seen any discussion around th
On 12 February 2010 04:50, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> There are two problems.
> First, object life scope. The modification causes this:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
> Grob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
> programming erro
Quoting Nicolas Sceaux :
Why not defining e.g. a score-lines markup list command, which can be
used in situations where it is preferable to get one stencil per system.
Hmm, this is certainly an interesting idea; I am going to experiment
with it to see where it leads us.
My only possible obj
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #4 on issue 922 by percival.music.ca: file sizes jumped from 2.13.1
to 2.13.2
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=922
Testing a fix.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Le 12 févr. 2010 à 05:50, Boris Shingarov a écrit :
> Quoting Neil Puttock :
>
>> If you do this, you'll have to change the \score command to a
>> markup-list command, since a markup command can only return a single
>> stencil. This is problematic
>
> Here is some proof-of-concept code. I am s
У пт, 2010-02-12 у 04:08 +, Ruben Zilibowitz пише:
> lilypond-book does not recognise
>
> >
> ...
> >
>
> as the lilypond tag, even though it is a valid way to write it.
Thank You, added as 1011:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1011
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
___
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Scripts Priority-Low Frog
New issue 1011 by brownian.box: lilypond-book does not recognize
<[/]lilypond> tag with :space: before '>'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1011
Reported by Ruben Zilibowitz:
--
lily
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
wrote:
> У пт, 2010-02-12 у 04:08 +, Ruben Zilibowitz пише:
>> > >
>>
>> as the lilypond tag, even though it is a valid way to write it.
>
> If it is the case (i've not tested so far), it may be considered as a
> bug (since sgml/html accepts a
У пт, 2010-02-12 у 04:08 +, Ruben Zilibowitz пише:
> lilypond-book does not recognise
>
> >
> ...
> >
>
> as the lilypond tag, even though it is a valid way to write it.
Hi!
If it is the case (i've not tested so far), it may be considered as a
bug (since sgml/html accepts any number of any
13 matches
Mail list logo
