Comment #4 on issue 974 by joeneeman: Copyright may be obscured by an
overly-full page when all header fields are used
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=974
Well there's clearly a bug, so I don't know how to make it display
correctly. But the
message here:
http://old.nabbl
Comment #3 on issue 974 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Copyright may be
obscured by an overly-full page when all header fields are used
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=974
Not that I know of, and, if so, what's the way to get this to display
correctly?
--
You received t
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: pnorcks
Comment #15 on issue 887 by pnorcks: PDF point-and-click URI links with
special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=887
I'm working on this issue again. Sorry about the delay.
Th
Comment #2 on issue 974 by joeneeman: Copyright may be obscured by an
overly-full page when all header fields are used
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=974
Didn't the thread on bug-lilypond conclude that the header block was
actually irrelevant?
--
You received this mess
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:26 +, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> When typesetting a large volume of markuplines, the Page Spacer gets
> confused by the setting of next-space (1.0 by default).
Thanks for finding this. next-space is deprecated, so this is a bug.
> It does
> take it into account when cal
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> As far as I can see, FcConfigGetCache is used in LilyPond. In Fontconfig
> version 2.4.0, that is correct. In version 2.6.0 of Fontconfig,
> FcConfigGetCache is deprecated, and the description of the function
> indicates that no per-user
Comment #1 on issue 974 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Copyright may be
obscured by an overly-full page when all header fields are used
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=974
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Attachments:
headers_2.13.8.png 264 KB
--
You rec
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Collision Regression
New issue 974 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Copyright may be obscured by
an overly-full page when all header fields are used
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=974
As of 2.13.9, the following example shows that wh
Comment #4 on issue 969 by john.mandereau: find a tool to convert SVG->EPS
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=969
The command-line switches for Inkscape used for building the old website
certainly
help producing a good result (at least for web/switch/howto), but maybe
they do
Comment #3 on issue 969 by pnorcks: find a tool to convert SVG->EPS
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=969
The conversion quality using Inkscape or ImageMagick is not very good (by
default).
There might be command-line switches that improve the quality, but I haven't
investig
Comment #3 on issue 968 by pnorcks: SVG backend: implement an
output-preview-framework
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=968
It would be incorrect, technically, to say that SVG files have resolution.
However, we could use -dresolution to scale the values of the viewBox
att
Comment #2 on issue 969 by percival.music.ca: find a tool to convert
SVG->EPS
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=969
We don't use imagemagick for the new website. I'm willing to consider
adding it, but
I don't see the benefit.
--
You received this message because you are
On 1/12/10 10:38 AM, "Jacob Rundall" wrote:
> I've just checked this issue on the latest stable (2.12.3-1) and the latest
> development version (2.13.10-1) and it still exists.
>
> Please advise when I should test again.
If we had this added to the tracker (it's not, as far as I can tell;
po
Comment #1 on issue 969 by Carl.D.Sorensen: find a tool to convert SVG->EPS
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=969
We already use ImageMagick for the website, IIUC. Why not just use that?
Alternatively, why not just use inkscape?
What are the limitations that cause you to prop
Comment #2 on issue 968 by Carl.D.Sorensen: SVG backend: implement an
output-preview-framework
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=968
How does SVG interact with resolution? SVG files don't have resolution,
IIUC. They're vector files.
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 941 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Enhancement: merging
make-markup-command and make-builtin-markup-command
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=941
The patches to do this have been accepted to both the code and the
documentation, IIUC.
I've just checked this issue on the latest stable (2.12.3-1) and the latest
development version (2.13.10-1) and it still exists.
Please advise when I should test again.
Thanks,
Jake
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Jacob Rundall wrote:
> 2.13.9-1 exhibits the same failure to create/place the
When typesetting a large volume of markuplines, the Page Spacer gets
confused by the setting of next-space (1.0 by default). It does
take it into account when calculating the forces, but ignores it when
actually placing the lines on the page. This leads to horrible layout.
For example, if line he
18 matches
Mail list logo
