Status: Accepted
Owner: pnorcks
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Regression
New issue 916 by pnorcks: Broken regtest: spacing-loose-grace-linebreak.ly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=916
With current git, spacing-loose-grace-linebreak.ly fails to compile. This
is the output:
GNU
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Regression Priority-Low
Comment #9 on issue 54 by pnorcks: clef moves multimeasure rest
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=54
Okay, I reported the regression in Issue 915. Hope that's okay.
--
You received this message because you are listed i
Status: Accepted
Owner: pnorcks
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Regression
New issue 915 by pnorcks: Multi-measure rests dependent on prefatory matter
in other staves
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=915
%{
The regression test `multi-measure-rest-multi-staff-center.ly'
broke be
2009/11/29 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:20 PM
>
>
>> I can not find something similar in open issues. It seems that lines
>> filled with spacing or multimeasure rests or give a first measure
>> wider than the others, in each line:
>>
>> \version "2.13.8"
>>
Updates:
Summary: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic syntax when used with
\relative
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Usability
Comment #3 on issue 451 by v.villenave: Enhancement: a more flexible
\parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative
http://code.google.com/p/li
Status: Accepted
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
New issue 914 by v.villenave: Enhancement: instrument-aware presets
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=914
New feature request from David:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-11/msg00716.h
Francisco Vila wrote Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:20 PM
I can not find something similar in open issues. It seems that
lines
filled with spacing or multimeasure rests or give a first measure
wider than the others, in each line:
\version "2.13.8"
{ \time 6/8
R2.*3 \break
R2.*4 \break
>
I can not find something similar in open issues. It seems that lines
filled with spacing or multimeasure rests or give a first measure
wider than the others, in each line:
\version "2.13.8"
{ \time 6/8
R2.*3 \break
R2.*4 \break
R2.*5
}
It would be a regression as 2.12 did not show i
Comment #2 on issue 451 by d...@gnu.org: \parallelMusic and \relative don't
mix
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=451
The minimal examples are invalid syntax. I have no idea whether they might
have been
invalid syntax at the time of the bug report. The following file appe
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #5 on issue 787 by v.villenave: script stack order fails with 2
more notes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=787
Works perfectly now. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue
Updates:
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: partcombine
Comment #1 on issue 261 by v.villenave: \partcombine prints rests (or not)
depending on order of voices
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=261
On a related note, see Issue 913.
--
You received this message becaus
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Still it would be nice to collect such snippets for a future fix of
> partcombine.Otherwise we'll have to think of all possible problesm againand
> create regtets again.
When the time comes, it should be as simple as
http://code.google
Status: Accepted
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low Engraving-nitpick partcombine
New issue 913 by v.villenave: \partcombine doesn't handle rests correctly
when its arguments have different lengths
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=913
% Obviously related to
Updates:
Summary: Regression: Arpeggios collide with notes when connectArpeggios is
set
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Regression
Comment #1 on issue 880 by v.villenave: Regression: Arpeggios collide with
notes when connectArpeggios is set
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issue
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Robin Bannister wrote:
> The priority should therefore be not Medium but Regression.
Thanks, updated.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lily
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #8 on issue 638 by v.villenave: auto-beam-settings do not take into
account *all* durations covered by the beam
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=638
OK, marking as Started.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the o
Seeing the issues in the priority/type table format made me realise
how important it is to get these categories right.
This thread (span arpeggio and single notes)
supplied the collision snippet which is registered as issue 880
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=880
No collis
17 matches
Mail list logo