Re: Enhancement request: Automatic glissando marks in chords

2009-08-20 Thread Valentin Villenave
2009/8/13 Patrick Schmidt : > From my point of view it would be more intuitive if it were possible to set > glissandi in chords just the way ties are set, e.g.: \glissando a> > resulting in one glissando mark for each voice in chords. But this is > probably hard to implement ... Yes, we already ha

Re: Enhancement request: automatic polyphony in TabStaff context

2009-08-20 Thread Valentin Villenave
2009/8/13 Patrick Schmidt : > quite handy (and logical) if it were possible to apply << {} \\ {} >> to > tabVoice if it's in a tabStaff context (especially when the piece doesn't > contain an awful lot of polyphonic bars). Note to myself: Marc has a patch about this on http://lists.gnu.org/archive

Issue 832 in lilypond: Wrong UTF-8 encoded filenames passed to gs

2009-08-20 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Started Cc: pnorcks Comment #1 on issue 832 by v.villenave: Wrong UTF-8 encoded filenames passed to gs http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=832 Please also read the discussion on http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-08/msg00137.htm

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-08-20, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:47:52 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > > Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:37:55 schrieb Patrick McCarty: > > > On 2009-08-20, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > > > To me this seems like guile is not able to properly handle wide

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:47:52 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:37:55 schrieb Patrick McCarty: > > On 2009-08-20, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > > To me this seems like guile is not able to properly handle wide UTF-8 > > > characters properly and messes up the

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:37:55 schrieb Patrick McCarty: > On 2009-08-20, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 10:48:09 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > > > Yes, I think that's the case here. It seems that gs is well able >

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-08-20, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 10:48:09 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > > Yes, I think that's the case here. It seems that gs is well able > > to handle 16- bit unicode characters, but it needs the correct > > file name. > > > > A little more playing around

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 10:48:09 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > Yes, I think that's the case here. It seems that gs is well able to handle > 16- bit unicode characters, but it needs the correct file name. > > A little more playing around shows th

Issue 832 in lilypond: Wrong UTF-8 encoded filenames passed to gs

2009-08-20 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave CC: reinhold.kainhofer Labels: Type-Defect Usability gs New issue 832 by v.villenave: Wrong UTF-8 encoded filenames passed to gs http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=832 Although Ghostscript is able to handle special characters in filenames, Lily

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Valentin Villenave
2009/8/20 Reinhold Kainhofer : > So, basically, lilypond messes up the proper UTF-8 encoding of the external > utility calls. OK, that is now in the tracker as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=832 Regards, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond m

Re: Ghostscript fails with special characters in filename

2009-08-20 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 03:41:57 schrieb ian_hulin: > I've just been investigating this a bit more and have finally managed to > install ghostscript 8.70 on my system. I have ghostscript 8.64 installed on my kubuntu system. > If I compile a .l