Issue 628 in lilypond: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil

2009-07-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 628 by pnorcks: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628 FTR, this is the only override needed: \numericTimeSignature In this case, the problem is that "feta-alphabet20.pfb" is loaded, which

Issue 593 in lilypond: extenders in FiguredBass add much vertical space

2009-07-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 593 by pnorcks: extenders in FiguredBass add much vertical space http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=593 This issue is no longer valid, but with current git there is a different problem: the FiguredBass context is placed too close to the Staff. See the a

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-07-31 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:22 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > > Sorry for the noise. This way is even worse, with bass clef and no bar > numbers. > > \version "2.13.4" > { \clef bass \repeat unfold 60 g4 } > > \layout { \context { \Score \remove "Bar_number_engraver" } } > \paper { system-count=5

Issue 325 in lilypond: system-count stops stretching

2009-07-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_4 Comment #2 on issue 325 by joeneeman: system-count stops stretching http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=325 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-07-31 Thread Francisco Vila
> Sorry for the noise. This way is even worse, with bass clef and no bar numbers. \version "2.13.4" { \clef bass \repeat unfold 60 g4 } \layout { \context { \Score \remove "Bar_number_engraver" } } \paper { system-count=5 } -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org www.csmbadajoz.com

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-07-31 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/7/31 Francisco Vila : > Here is a sample file from the real world, fairly simplified. Just > comment out the paper block and the spacing looks fine. Please forget the last file, get this one instead, it is _minimal_ for the bug and not messed up by convert-ly like the previous one. -- Franc

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-07-31 Thread Francisco Vila
> 2009/7/31 Joe Neeman : > After fixing the latest round of bugs (pointed out by Neil Puttock and > Michael Käppler), I've pushed the changes to git's master branch. That > is, you should test master instead of dev/jneeman and bugs now belong on > the bug list instead of in this thread. > > Thanks

\fermataMarkups should flip when below staff

2009-07-31 Thread gnomino
Hello, The \fermataMarkup command always produces a downward-facing symbol, even if placed below the staff: % the second \fermataMarkup isn't flipped, unlike the second \fermata \relative { c1^\fermata c1_\fermata R1^\fermataMarkup R1_\fermataMarkup } The following definition of \fermataMarkup