Status: Accepted
Owner: gpermus
Labels: Type-Other Priority-Low
New issue 722 by gpermus: newline inside @macro{} in texinfo screws up
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=722
Texinfo and/or texi2html screws up if a @macro{is spread
over two lines}. See for example @rlearning{}.
Jonathan: another item for you.
Don't worry about the formatting or the exact spacing; just shove
it in there, since NR 4 is slated for a complete rewrite in a few
months.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:03:51PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Robin Bannister wrote:
> > Readers are not
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:26:08AM +, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> 2009/1/10 Jesse Engle :
> >> I'm not top posting.
> >
> > % use of Ambitus_engraver in DrumStaff causes program crash
> >
> Percussion noteheads are unpitched, so you shouldn't expect ambitus to
> work in this situation.
Hi Jesse,
2009/1/10 Jesse Engle :
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> % use of Ambitus_engraver in DrumStaff causes program crash
>
> \version "2.12.1"
>
> hands = \drummode {
>\repeat unfold 2 {
>cymr8 cymr << cymr sn >> cymr
>}
> }
>
> feet = \drummode {
>hhp4 hhp
> I'm not top posting.
% use of Ambitus_engraver in DrumStaff causes program crash
\version "2.12.1"
hands = \drummode {
\repeat unfold 2 {
cymr8 cymr << cymr sn >> cymr
}
}
feet = \drummode {
hhp4 hhp hhp hhp
}
\score {
\new DrumStaff \with {
Robin Bannister wrote:
> Readers are not told what size a point is;
> they have to work it out from the example given.
> So it is important to get this right: 105 mm
Another confusion readers may have is that staff-size and
staff-height seem to be used interchangeably, for example
in NR 4.2.1
> 148 millimeters, the height of a6 paper in landscape orientation
says v2.12 NR 4.6.1.
Readers are not told what size a point is;
they have to work it out from the example given.
So it is important to get this right: 105 mm
Cheers,
Robin
___
bu
I'm forwarding this to bug-lilypond and John, since bug reports on
-user sometimes get lost. John, this is your domain, but it's not
urgent and can definitely wait until after the 19th. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:16:45PM +1100, Nick Payne wrote:
> The html version of the sni
