Re: Help with debugging apparent error in parser

2008-08-08 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 8/8/08 5:57 PM, "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/8 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> This experience causes me to believe that there is a bug in the parser >> related to chordmode. > > I presume you've had a look at lexer.ll? I haven't looked at lexer.ll this time

Re: Help with debugging apparent error in parser

2008-08-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: \> Changing line 827 from > > else if ((handle = scm_hashq_get_handle (chordmodifier_tab_, sym)) != > SCM_BOOL_F) > > to > > else if ((YYSTATE == chords) > && (handle = scm_hashq_get_handle (chordmodifier_t

Re: Help with debugging apparent error in parser

2008-08-08 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/8/8 Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This experience causes me to believe that there is a bug in the parser > related to chordmode. I presume you've had a look at lexer.ll? It seems a bit dodgy to me that Lily_lexer::scan_bare_word () checks for a match in the chord modifier hash tab

Re: Help with debugging apparent error in parser

2008-08-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Carl You may be right, but the details of the parser/lexer logic have so far defeated me. As it's late and as I'm away most of Saturday I shall withdraw, beaten, from this discussion :( Trevor - Original Message - From: "Carl D. Sorensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EM

Re: Augmentation dot problem in 2.11.55

2008-08-08 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/8/8 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Shall I add it to the tracker anyway? If it gets fixed by this > week-end, I might just leave it untracked. Probably not necessary, since it's a side-effect of reverting my original fix for the leger lines patch (which caused the segfault when re

Re: Help with debugging apparent error in parser

2008-08-08 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 8/8/08 3:09 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carl > > This isn't a problem specific to chordmode. If you use > an identifier c you get a similar error about unexpected > notename_pitch whatever the input mode. The problem is > the identifier m. > > Because m is a valid chor

Re: clipping fails when header has title

2008-08-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson
The problem remains in the latest 2.11.x version. The *-from-1.0.1-to-2.0.1-clip.{pdf,eps} files are created correctly, but the *.{.ps,pdf} files are empty when the title is present. Perhaps this is what triggers the Scheme error message. /Mats Derek Poon wrote: I'm not top posting.

Re: Augmentation dot problem in 2.11.55

2008-08-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/8/8 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've posted a patch which will fix this > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-08/msg00131.html); > it's awaiting Han-Wen's approval. Shall I add it to the tracker anyway? If it gets fixed by this week-end, I might just leave it untrac

clipping fails when header has title

2008-08-08 Thread Derek Poon
> I'm not top posting. %% An error occurs when making clips when there is a header with a %% title. When the title is present, the clips are generated %% successfully, but the full-score layout fails with: %% %% ERROR: Wrong type (expecting pair): () \version "2.10.33" % Equivalent to invoking

Re: Augmentation dot problem in 2.11.55

2008-08-08 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi, I've posted a patch which will fix this (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-08/msg00131.html); it's awaiting Han-Wen's approval. Regards, Neil ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin

Re: Augmentation dot problem in 2.11.55

2008-08-08 Thread David Bobroff
No, sorry; it was 2.11.55-1. -David Mats Bengtsson wrote: David Bobroff wrote: I just tried it on XP and Fedora 8. Looks fine here. Dots are *not* on staff lines. Are you sure that you used exactly the same version (2.11.55-2)? These things shouldn't differ between platforms. I can repeat

Re: Augmentation dot problem in 2.11.55

2008-08-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson
David Bobroff wrote: I just tried it on XP and Fedora 8. Looks fine here. Dots are *not* on staff lines. Are you sure that you used exactly the same version (2.11.55-2)? These things shouldn't differ between platforms. I can repeat the problem on Linux and it's clearly a bug. /Mats -

Re: Help with debugging apparent error in parser

2008-08-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Carl This isn't a problem specific to chordmode. If you use an identifier c you get a similar error about unexpected notename_pitch whatever the input mode. The problem is the identifier m. Because m is a valid chord modifier and the parser/lexer is scanning for chordmodifiers or pitchnames it