Although it should be simple enough to set up a soft link as a
temporary fix. (Unless it's Windows, where it might be possible; I
haven't used Windows extensively for many months and don't remember.)
Geoff
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu
Issue 543: allow lilypond-book to call other commands
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=543
New issue report by gpermus:
lilypond-book always calls `latex'. There is no possibility to make
it call `xelatex', or `lambda', or `lualatex' instead. It should be
straightforward to re
Thanks, that was very clear. Added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=543
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:24:06 +0100 (CET)
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid that I don't understand this report. How does lilypond
> > not "cooperate" with lam
Issue 531: lilypond-book for lsr: [texinfo,quote,verbatim]
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=531
Comment #4 by gpermus:
True, I'd forgotten about the \header{} stuff.
What about taking everything below the \header{} ? The examples that I
want to
include in the docs have nice
> I'm afraid that I don't understand this report. How does lilypond
> not "cooperate" with lambda?
>
> Werner, are you following this? Could you supply a description for
> the google tracker?
lilypond-book always calls `latex'. There is no possibility to make
it call `xelatex', or `lambda', o
Issue 531: lilypond-book for lsr: [texinfo,quote,verbatim]
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=531
Comment #3 by john.mandereau:
'verbatim' option for @lilypondfile was not implemented, actually.
I implemented it, but as you certainly don't want to add verbatim full
code of
snipp
I'm afraid that I don't understand this report. How does lilypond
not "cooperate" with lambda?
Werner, are you following this? Could you supply a description
for the google tracker?
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:46:44 + (UTC)
Minsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello lilypond-tea
