Ok, entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=515
Cheers,
-Graham
David Bobroff wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
There's a couple of "ugly slur" issues in the tracker. If you want me
to add another, please submit a minimal example.
I don't realistically expect anybody to st
Issue 515: ugly slur (too flat)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=515
New issue report by gpermus:
% this slur is too flat
\version "2.11.35"
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\relative c' {
\key f \major
\time 2/4
f'2(
bes4 f)
}
Issue attributes:
Status: Accepted
> I'm not top posting.
%% the \repeatTie command resets tie direction to \tieNeutral
in polyphonic systems.
\version "2.10.33"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\relative c''
{
{
\repeat volta 2 {c1~} \alternative {{c4 b a g }{c4\repeatTie d c b }}
}
\\
{
a1~|a4 g f e |a4\repeatTie b a g
converted a piece of music from 1.7.17 to 2.10.10 with convert-ly.
Result contains a call to \oldaddlyrics. When running lilypond - either 2.10.33
or 2.11.34 - I get the error: cannot find music object: OldLyricCombineMusic
\version "2.10.33"
{
\oldaddlyrics
\context Staff = "sa" { c d e f }
Graham Percival wrote:
Isn't this another case of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=405&q=tuplet
No, since it's about printing the number, not the bracket.
There's a comment in lily/tuplet-number.cc about some rows of code that
remove the number object if it doesn't span time
There are no convert-ly binaries and have never been. However, it seems that
the python binary is missing in the 2.11.35-2 package for Windows.
The same or similar problem have already been reported for Linux.
/Mats
Joshua Koo wrote:
Hi,
I havent been using lilypond for some time, so I down
Graham Percival wrote:
There's a couple of "ugly slur" issues in the tracker. If you want me
to add another, please submit a minimal example.
I don't realistically expect anybody to start fiddling with the slur
code for at least half a year, though.
Cheers,
- Graham
Ok, this is about as m
I don't think so:
In this new case, the triplets are treated as merely being time
values (2/3 notes), which do not need to fill up the whole triplet
value. It is thus possible to only have one 2/3 note standing alone,
completed by additional 2/3 notes in other positions. Then one expect
t
