Re: Beam collides with notehead in polyphonic music

2007-01-21 Thread Graham Percival
Carl D. Sorensen wrote: Not top posting Will this do as a minimal example? Unfortunately not. I spent five minute working on this; see below. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=252 To have it make musical sense I need three voices and merged notes; to have the problem I ne

RE: Beam collides with notehead in polyphonic music

2007-01-21 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
> Not top posting Will this do as a minimal example? To have it make musical sense I need three voices and merged notes; to have the problem I need to have beamed eighth-notes. %Beam collides with notehead in polyphonic music with three voices in a staff \paper { ragged-last = ##t } \ve

Re: Compilation Progress Messages - a suggestion

2007-01-21 Thread Graham Percival
ian_hulin wrote: Each pass of the compilation starts with a {whatever}ing ... type message, may have a progress message ([1] [2] [3] or suchlike), and is terminated by a 'successful completion' message. Obviously there would also be messages to inform the user if the particular phase of the comp

Re: subdivideBeams behaviour

2007-01-21 Thread Graham Percival
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Alard de Boer escreveu: On 17/01/07, Alard de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello list, Does anyone know how subdivideBeams is supposed to work with automatic beaming? I haven't seen any replies to this message I sent a couple of days ago. It's a bug. Filed as htt

Issue 251 in project lilypond

2007-01-21 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 251: subdivideBeams and automatic beaming http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=251 New issue report by gpermus: %{ 1) The last beam of the first measure is subdivided; a workaround for this is setting subdivideBeams after the first note in the second measure, but is there a cle

Compilation Progress Messages - a suggestion

2007-01-21 Thread ian_hulin
First of all, many thanks to Han-Wen, Jan, Graham and all the development team on a great free-source 'product'. This isn't a bug as such, more of a suggestion. There was a whole discussion recently about the format of the postscript file, did you need it, and if so should it be ps-2 or ps-3 for

Re: subdivideBeams behaviour

2007-01-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Alard de Boer escreveu: > On 17/01/07, Alard de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello list, > > Does anyone know how subdivideBeams is supposed to work > with automatic beaming? I haven't seen any replies to this > message I sent a couple of days ago. > It's a bug. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [