Re: Roman numeral for 4 should be iv not iiii

2006-05-08 Thread Geoff Horton
Nobody in the USA uses Old Roman or even learns it in grade school. "Nobody" is a little strong. I knew about it :) Geoff ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Roman numeral for 4 should be iv not iiii

2006-05-08 Thread Rick Hansen (aka RickH)
Thanks, Nobody in the USA uses Old Roman or even learns it in grade school. I think the future releases should use New Roman as the default or switch to Arabic for no confusion. I have so many "patches" and work-araounds applied to my .scm files that I dont think I'll ever be able to upgrade li

Re: Roman numeral for 4 should be iv not iiii

2006-05-08 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
"Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm using 2.8.0 > > This is a minor bug, probably easy to fix... > > For guitar fret board markup, the position marker > > When the 4th fretting postion is called for, it prints "" instead of > "iv", there is no such thing as roman nu

pitched trill

2006-05-08 Thread Damian leGassick
with a pitched trill , lilypond sticks an extra accidental before the main note. for example, in the documentation, there's a stray sharp on the F-line. Documentation/user/lilypond/Trills.html#Trills any way round this? liking the program a lot, btw Damian __

Roman numeral for 4 should be iv not iiii

2006-05-08 Thread Rick Hansen (aka RickH)
I'm using 2.8.0 This is a minor bug, probably easy to fix... For guitar fret board markup, the position marker When the 4th fretting postion is called for, it prints "" instead of "iv", there is no such thing as roman numeral "". I'm pretty sure all the other roman numerals are ok.

Re: logical but wrong beam placement in tuplet

2006-05-08 Thread Paul Scott
Mats Bengtsson wrote: Paul Scott wrote: I believe I have read about a bug list but I don't find it documented. I would have researched this but don't want to search the whole bug list archive. The newest easily browsable version of the bug list I know of is available at http://lilypond.org/

Re: logical but wrong beam placement in tuplet

2006-05-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Paul Scott wrote: I believe I have read about a bug list but I don't find it documented. I would have researched this but don't want to search the whole bug list archive. The newest easily browsable version of the bug list I know of is available at http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.8/. /Mats