Re: bar number direction doumentation inconsistent

2006-04-04 Thread Graham Percival
On 1-Apr-06, at 11:58 PM, Paul Scott wrote: |direction| (direction): |1| Up or down, left or right? The new reader wouldn't know that 1 was UP and -1 was DOWN and 0 was in the middle. Also LEFT and RIGHT are the same as DOWN and UP, respectively. Ok, thanks. Fixed in CVS. - Graham

Re: default placement of codas and segnos over barlines

2006-04-04 Thread Graham Percival
On 2-Apr-06, at 7:25 AM, Dave K. wrote: As far as I can tell there is no flush left/flush right option in Lilypond, Yes there is; see the documentation for Text marks and/or Rehearsal marks. They're in chapter 8. Yes, I know I can manually align every single symbol I markup, but that shou

Re: Rehearsal marks buglist

2006-04-04 Thread Jordi Nadal
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote: Here is a work-around that I'm using for now: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol = #'clef \mark \markup{ \hspace #0 \raise #1.5 "Bossa Nova" } Thanks, with this setting 2.8.1 behaviour is like 2.6 except at line beginning. Maybe it should be th

Re: Newbee how to submit bug supporting documents

2006-04-04 Thread Graham Percival
On 4-Apr-06, at 8:24 AM, Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote: How do I submit bug reports and their supporting .ly and .pdf (input/output) documents? You could read the manual, 5.7 Reporting bugs Can I just send an Email to somewhere with the documents attached? We generally prefer to have an

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Graham Percival
On 4-Apr-06, at 10:04 AM, Geoff Horton wrote: Put this at the top of your input file: #(ly:set-option (quote no-point-and-click)) Should this be given more prominent play in the manual? I think we've had several questions on it of late, and you kind of have to know the answer already to go lo

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Daniel Johnson
Dennis O'Toole wrote: After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6 to use.

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Geoff Horton
> the problem with file sizes doesn't have anything to do with point & > click though. It's usually that people are running unpatched Ghostscript > 8.x instead of using the GUB builds. I don't know about that. I ran a few files through with and without that line: With point-and-click enabled: 76

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
David Feuer wrote: On 4/4/06, Geoff Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to store and distribute, so

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread David Feuer
On 4/4/06, Geoff Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are > > > considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size > > > formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to > > > store and distribute, s

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Geoff Horton
> > After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are > > considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size > > formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to > > store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6 > > to use. > > Put

Re: 2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Geoff Horton
> After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are > considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size > formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to > store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6 > to use. Put this at the

2.8.1 pdf file size

2006-04-04 Thread Dennis O'Toole
After upgrading to 2.8.1, I notice that the .pdf files produced are considerable larger, on the order of about 5 to 10 times the size formerly produced. This has a detrimental effect on my ability to store and distribute, so much that I have to back level to 2.6 to use. Thank you. _

Re: Rehearsal marks buglist

2006-04-04 Thread Paul Scott
Mats Bengtsson wrote: Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote: Here is a work-around that I'm using for now: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol = #'clef \mark \markup{ \hspace #0 \raise #1.5 "Bossa Nova" } I would rather use: \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'padding = #1.5 \mark

Newbee how to submit bug supporting documents

2006-04-04 Thread Rick Hansen (aka RickH)
I'm new so please forgive me. How do I submit bug reports and their supporting .ly and .pdf (input/output) documents? Can I just send an Email to somewhere with the documents attached? If so to where? I've learned LiliPond quicly, but am running into items that appear to be real bugs and was t

Re: lilypond speed on windows in 2.8.1 - back to running slowly

2006-04-04 Thread Dave K.
On 4/4/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > It seems that I have fixed this problem on accident again in 2.8.1-2 > (without actually knowing how I did it.) -- Please have a go, YMMV. Works for me, thanks. ___ bug-

Re: Rehearsal marks buglist

2006-04-04 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote: Here is a work-around that I'm using for now: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol = #'clef \mark \markup{ \hspace #0 \raise #1.5 "Bossa Nova" } I would rather use: \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'padding = #1.5 \mark "Bossa Nova" /Mats

Re: Beams and accidentals

2006-04-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I've noticed a bug in 2.9.1 (using Windows) beam heights are not > adjusted to accommodate the height of the accidental. > > As can be seen in the example below the flat sign goes through the > beam as does the natural. That alone wouldn't qualify as a bug IMHO -- I can imagine that it sometime

Re: lilypond speed on windows in 2.8.1 - back to running slowly

2006-04-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: dave k wrote: 2.8.0-5 fortunately fixed the problem of Lilypond running slowly on Windows (having to recreate the font cache every time), but this problem has returned in 2.8.1-1. Yes, I can verify. Unfortunately, I'm a bit flabbergasted about why it fell over once

Beams and accidentals

2006-04-04 Thread Trent Johnston
Hi Everyone, I've noticed a bug in 2.9.1 (using Windows) beam heights are not adjusted to accommodate the height of the accidental. As can be seen in the example below the flat sign goes through the beam as does the natural. I've also noticed an interesting item in the last beamed group. The pre

Resigning

2006-04-04 Thread Erik Sandberg
Hi, I haven't had the time to catch up with all the bugs that have been reported over the past few weeks. This is largely because of Real Life issues (i.e., I haven't had time). Furthermore, I will start a new job next week, which will further restrict my lilypond time. I have concluded that t