Re: Bar numbers and rehearsal marks

2006-03-21 Thread Jordi Nadal
Ok, now in 2.7.40 rehearsal marks are almost perfect. The last remaining issue (not present in 2.6) is matter of horizontal spacing: when they're in the beginning of a line they overlap G clef. { \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-alphabet R1 \mark \default \break % mark and clef c

Re: re the template 2.1 4 for notes, chords, and lyrics together

2006-03-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Yes! What LilyPond version did you use? /Mats Quoting Annette Giesbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Aren't the words of the lyrics ((A B C D (or whatever you make up)) supposed to be in the lyric text file when you play the midi through Winamp? Annette

Re: Problem with lilypad

2006-03-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson
That's a bug! I managed to repeat the problem once (with an input file that had too old \version statement). Then, I tried opening the myfile.log file from within lilypad (you have to select Files of type: "All files" in File -> Open). After that, all .log files opened correctly in Lilypad, so t

re the template 2.1 4 for notes, chords, and lyrics together

2006-03-21 Thread Annette Giesbrecht
Aren't the words of the lyrics ((A B C D (or whatever you make up)) supposed to be in the lyric text file when you play the midi through Winamp? Annette ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-li

Re: New lilypond-book error message in 7.2.39, mingw

2006-03-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Quoting Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Mats Bengtsson wrote: I don't really understand why we could not include the full subprocess module in the Python included in the lilypond package. It's included in the native Windows version of Python available at www.python.org, so it's certain

A minor lilypond-book bug

2006-03-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson
If you happen to call 'lilypond-book -V' without any more options, you get a fairly unfriendly error message. This happened in 2.6 as well and is certainly not release critical. /Mats ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists

Re: \relative issue

2006-03-21 Thread Paul Scott
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Werner LEMBERG wrote: In light of this suprising you and the idea that relative means relative to something I might suggest that there be no default and that not specifying a starting point be an error. Yep. The following responses are not necessary to try to convince

Re: \relative issue

2006-03-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> In light of this suprising you and the idea that relative means > relative to something I might suggest that there be no default and > that not specifying a starting point be an error. Yep. Werner ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu

Re: \relative issue

2006-03-21 Thread Paul Scott
Werner LEMBERG wrote: I consider this unnatural. Additionally, it isn't documented in section `Relative octaves' that the default startpitch is c' (and not c). Actually isn't middle C (c') as logical as anything as default. What's special about the octave below middle C? Conside