Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> looks like the barline closing a staff or system is a tad
>> bit (half a stafflinewidth on both ends, I'd say) too short,
>
> This has been fixed in 2.5.1 ; you want a backport?
Indeed, funny I noticed it just now. No
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> looks like the barline closing a staff or system is a tad
> bit (half a stafflinewidth on both ends, I'd say) too short,
> producing a staircase effect visible at bigger font sizes.
> There is no such problem at the beginning of the staves
> (where the barline i
Hi,
looks like the barline closing a staff or system is a tad
bit (half a stafflinewidth on both ends, I'd say) too short,
producing a staircase effect visible at bigger font sizes.
There is no such problem at the beginning of the staves
(where the barline is somewhat thicker, too). This can be
o
You have clearly found a counter example to what is supposed to
be shown in the example phrasing-slur-slur-avoid.ly of the Regression
Test document. I forward it to the bug-lilypond mailing list.
/Mats
Karl Hammar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Hello, here is a peace of the first Sonata for clarin
