Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, as you may have seen, I have already introduced the
> patch in CVS
Yes, thanks Mats.
> , but I can revert it if you don't like it.
No, without more information I don't like the way Red Hat goes about
this, but now that it seems to be a gene
"Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure I understand clearly the problem.
Me neither, that's why I asked for an explanation. As I read it the
assumption by cfg is false, and is no reason for the patch. There may
be another reason why it could be necessary, but I'd like to kn
Please send (to the mailing list) a small example of an input file and
tell exactly what command you use. Then it's easier to find out what
problem you have.
/Mats
Prashant Raina wrote:
Whenever I invoke lilypond-book on an HTML file, it
keeps saying that the file does not exist.
- [EMAIL PROTE
Actually, as you may have seen, I have already introduced the
patch in CVS, but I can revert it if you don't like it.
/Mats
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
"Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm not sure I understand clearly the problem.
Me neither, that's why I asked for an explanation.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Dave Symonds wrote:
Just thought I'd post this again. I didn't get any response to the
previous posting, and it's really bugging me. I've tried all I can. Please
help me!
> With the attached fragment, the chord names bump into each other; I'm
> using lily 2.0.0 (but it happen
Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But only if you start a second login shell, and you shouldn't be doing that.
>
> Sadly I don't have to do that. RedHat in their infinite wisdom run the
> scripts in /etc/profile.d from /etc/bashrc if they haven't already been
> run by /etc/profile.
The
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> But only if you start a second login shell, and you shouldn't be doing that.
> >
> > Sadly I don't have to do that. RedHat in their infinite wisdom run the
> > scripts in /etc/profile.d from /etc/bashrc
"Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have you included this patch?
Not yet.
> -[ ! -d $docdir ] && docdir=$(echo @prefix@/share/doc/lilypond-[.-0-9]*)
> -[ ! -d $docdir ] && docdir=$(echo @prefix@/doc/lilypond-[.-0-9]*)
> +[ ! -d $docdir ] && docdir=$(echo @prefix@/share/doc/lilypond-[
> I remember seeing it, but wanted to change it slightly to:
>
>+ ... -[-.0-9]*)
That's OK.
> Could you shed some light on this problem:
>
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg00611.html
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg00733.html
>
> because I think it's a non-iss
